Talk:Baa, Baa, Black Sheep

Origins

Has anyone got any idea about the historical background to this nursery rhyme?

Possibly, but not our article. It points to a website at www.famousquotes.me.uk which has a lot of invented/traditional but false "histories" for nursery rhymes. For example its ring a ring a roses gives a plague history on no evidence. Given that nursery rhymes change very fast until written down many seem unlikely. The plague history was authoritatively demolised by Iona Opie in "the Singing Game". I don't know what she says about Baa Baa Black Sheep, but there will be something. Francis Davey 10:28, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Dame v. Maid

I have heard the rhyme recited as either "One for the dame" or "One for the maid". Should the latter be put in brackets?

Sounds like a mistake to me since it doesn't rhyme and dame does (well near enough). Francis Davey 08:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

I don't know if necro posting is a thing on Wikipedia but I just wanted to add that I also grew up with the "maid" variant of this rhyme. And, while I'm obviously prepared to accept the version I know isn't the "main" version, there is nothing wrong with "maid" in the rhyming scheme. The only relevant sound in the rhyme is the ay phoneme, which is present in maid, dame, and lane. John Bullock (talk) 23:00, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

I also want to add my voice to those who also grew up with Maid. Could there potentially be a difference between the written version and the oral tradition in some areas where the nursery rhyme is used? RichF86 (talk) 08:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Rich, I also grew up with it as "Maid". I work in a nursery a town over and they all know it as dame, but I had no idea the "dame" version existed before I started there.

I asked my mum to sing Baa Baa Black Sheep without looking up the lyrics and I confirm she knows it as maid. She also had a similar reaction to what I did upon finding out it was usually dame: "Dame???? [pulls weird face]".

I told her Dame was the usual version and she said "Oh well, I grew up with maid and it's going to stay maid." From this, I asked her if Grandma had taught her the song as maid and she said yes, she would have done. She never heard her mum saying dame, but maid.

For reference, my grandma was born in the 1920s, so we have a rough 100 years oral account of "Maid" here. Manchester, England.

Also, Frances, whether or not maid rhymes better than dame is irrelevant to the discussion. If there is an account of "maid" being used over a long period of time, then this is an official version of the nursery rhyme. (though personally I think maid sounds better, but perhaps this is dependant on accent which might be how it changed in the first place) Mary Lou Rorie (talk) 21:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Anyone know

What is the source of this rhyme? Rich Farmbrough 16:05, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

Which Birmingham?

Many cities are named Birmingham. Which Birmingham is the article text talking about?

It is refering to the England city of Birmingham I remember something to this nature being mentioned on the news over here in the UK and here is a follow up article on the "scrapping" of the idea BBC News - Nursery rhyme ban scrapped

Coloured parents? Coloured children?!

How ironic that in an article discussing racial sensitivity the outdated term "coloured" should be used twice. I know many black people who would be deeply offended to be referred to as 'coloured' (they wouldn't care less about Baa Baa Black Sheep, however).

the trouble is that what is "sensitive" varies from place to place. Here (in the UK) "black" seems to be favoured, and "colour" not approved of, but I know that is not true in other places.

Who says that "coloured" people are necessarily black? Maybe they're some other non-white ethnic group. Just a thought. Pygmypony (talk) 15:31, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

This alleged censorship is rubbish.

The various claims about banning the rhyme in different places in different times are complete bollocks, an urban myth that's been doing the rounds in the press - even dear old Auntie - since 1986. Ou tis 00:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, a few private nurseries and education councils attempted to avoid the word "black" over concerns it could be interpreted as racially negative. Some changed the lyrics to "Baa Baa Rainbow Sheep" or "Happy Sheep".

These isolated local decisions were heavily covered by the media, which sparked national debates. Most of these localized "bans" or recommendations were quickly scrapped after receiving backlash from parents who considered them unnecessary.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/600470.stm Diablo666Daemon666 (talk) 03:39, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

My little cousin learnt it as 'Baa Baa Rainbow Sheep'. Unfortunately, it does happen. From my personal experience, most people (including black people) think that it is ridiculous. I'm in England, by the way. Zestos (talk) 05:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Baa Baa Happy Sheep in some Lincolnshire Schools, either that or it's not taught at all.

Erasing English Culture, piece by piece... ~2026-33639-83 (talk) 02:37, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

baa baa ethnic minority sheep

Baa baa ethnic minority sheep, have you any wool derived products? Yes sir, yes miss, three bags full. One for the democratically elected leader, one for the dame. One for the vertically challanged child that resident down the lane. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.11.188.27 (talk) 12:18, 4 March 2007 (UTC).

baa baa corporate sheep

Yes this corporate sheep distributes its yeild 1/3rd portion to the promoters (masters), 1/3rd to labours (dame/maid who looked after the sheep) 1/3rd for the social commitment (who is lying down the lane) comment by leo, 5 April 2007

Baa Baa Rainbow Sheep

Under "Modern Alterations" this page currently reads the following: 'These changes have met with considerable criticism, many citing it as "political correctness gone mad", because of the fact that the rhyme was changed for racial and not for educational reasons.'

However, one of the sources cited, Nursery opts for 'rainbow' sheep, quotes the charity, Parents and Children Together (Pact) as saying that the changes were made for educational reasons. I am going to edit this section to read the following instead: 'These changes have been met with considerable criticism, many citing it as "political correctness gone mad', because of the presumption that the rhyme was changed for racial reasons, despite the claim of one of the bodies involved that the changes were educationally motivated.'

I also wonder how appropriate the phrasing "several kindergartens and nurseries have been teaching children different versions of the rhyme" is when the sources linked only talk about two or three specific cases in the United Kingdom. --Foetus In Fetu 18:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

It's ridiculous! "Baa Baa rainbow sheep" doesn't exactly go. The rhyme isn't referring to skin colour anyway, plus since when was there rainbow sheep? At least you get black sheep! I'm sure some black people feel that by the schools doing that, it is making the rhyme racist. Whoniverse93 talk? 23:45, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

One day after work recently, some of the locals had a little creche of nursery-age kids going in the corner of the pub. A few nursery rhymes naturally got trotted out. All the kids sung Baa Baa Rainbow Sheep. I live in a non-distinct part of Tameside.

I don't know if that means the relevent section of page needs to be updated. Either way I think there's a few racist nursery teachers in my part of the world. Aheyfromhome (talk) 20:38, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

What is "Educational" about such a change? Do tell...

Whether it's Political Correctness or not, it is at least pre-emptive censorship.

The problem these days isn't about something "offending" people, its about whether or not it may possibly, in some tiny way, EVER offend someone...even 100 years from now.

Case in point, the Scottish Pub that spent 350 years being called "The Black Bitch".

"The Black Bitch Pub in Linlithgow, West Lothian, was renamed The Black Hound. The 17th-century tavern is now owned by the Greene King brewery chain, which decided to rebrand the venue over fears that the original name — despite being rooted in a local 13th-century myth about a heroic black Greyhound - could be found offensive or misconstrued in modern times."

Note the keyword there...COULD, not HAS. ~2026-33639-83 (talk) 02:44, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

I hav

its swedish also, by a guy named augustBold text —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.131.35.195 (talk) 08:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

"Cries" vs. "Lives"

I have heard the rhyme as "the little boy who cries down (or in) the lane." Perhaps put it in brackets or as a different version? Graymornings 03:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Dame should read DANE.

This nursery rhyme is consistently miswritten (and recited) by referring to a Dame. In the middle ages women were regarded by and large as chattels of men and would in any event never be referred to as "dame" which is the shortened word for the French Madame (meaning 'my lady') and to which would be apportioned the name of the husband. However large parts of England were occupied by Vikings and their descendants and were known as Danes (for Danish). Indeed, were a line drawn from the Wash to Chester everything North of that line was under DaneLaw. Places like Leicester and York being under Dane Law are well documented and existed before the Norman (ie French language conquest)and after the conquest the cultural elements remained deeply entrenched in the countryside right up to the times of the great wool trade where traders not only provided wool for domestic consumption but for export too. So "one for the Master" (home), "one for the Dane" (established export) and "one for the little boy down the lane" (anyone else)Charlesenglish 00:14, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Nice theory, but is there, in fact, any evidence for it? I bet no. Nursery rhymes don't generally represent ancient traditions so its very unlikely that something dating back to the Danelaw would turn up. If you can prove it, produce the references (and I don't mean another website or recent book with the same theory). Francis Davey 08:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Always sung as Dane, when I was a kid in the 1970s, rather than Dame. Never even heard of Dame being used instead of Dane, in that nursery rhyme. Oh well, I suppose that is Wikipedia for you. You learn something new everyday! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.108.117 (talk) 21:47, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

My Grandparents would disagree. Was always sang as "Dame" to them.

The Rhyme also predates ANY Danes coming to England in sufficient numbers. ~2026-33639-83 (talk) 02:46, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Is there a source for little Sean from Aberdeen?

I have moved to here the bit about a second verse mentioning Sean from Aberdeen pending a reliable source. The text in the article was:

An occasionally used second verse is:

Thank you said the master,

Thank you said the dame,

Thank you said the little Sean

Who lives in Aberdeen.

Does anyone have a reference for this? Stumps 22:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

No - but where I live te second verse is

Thank you said the master,

Thank you said the dame,

Thank you said the little boy,

Who Livesdown the lane.

Perhaps it could just be mentioned? Vitual aelita (talk) 23:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Unsourced versions

This article has several versions that are not supported by citations. I plan to remove them to stop the article getting out of hand as editors have a habit of adding endless and often pointless versions once it begins. If you have citations please supply them. If you have reasoned objections to this move please give them in this section.--Sabrebd (talk) 07:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Baa, Baa, White Sheep?

Am I right to think that in Britain there is a version, Baa Baa White Sheep, where the sheep has no wool for anyone:

Baa, Baa, white sheep, have you any wool? No sir, No sir, No bags full, None for the master, none for the dame, and none for the little boy who lives down the lane.

I'm sure I remember being taught this in nursery. Could anyone back me up? Lwebdan (talk) 20:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

I've not heard that before. I was born in the UK and lived in various parts of England and Scotland and can't recall hearing it. However, I found this from Australia, it's on the last page. I also came across this from the US. It has black, white and grey. The interesting thing there is that it's spelt "grey" and not the usual US spelling of "gray". Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 01:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

The odds are that the white sheep version is one of the many local variations. They come and they go, often in attempts to lengthen the rhyme. Some make it into print, but none has so far become an accpeted part of the rhyme.--SabreBD (talk) 07:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

I can verify this "White Sheep" one. However, it is not an "official" version taught in Schools.

It's one of those parody things that we make ourselves.

Like the one about Postman Pat running over his Cat, or the one about Old Mother Hubbard's Dog giving her a Bone. ~2026-33639-83 (talk) 02:50, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Multiple verses

As a child in the 1960's I can remember singing a three or four verse version of this from a school textbook. Each verse dealt with a different colour sheep, It also came with a commentary explaining the song. I can't remember exactly, but the first verse was on the lines of

Baa Baa Black Sheep have you any wool? Yes sir, no sir none for you One for the Master, One for the Dane None for the working man who lives down the lane

second verse - something like Baa Baa White sheep have you any wool? Yes sir, No sir, None for you One for the Bishop, The rest for the King None for the little man who kisses his ring

third verse was Baa Baa Brown Sheep Yes Sir, Yes Sir, all for you

fourth verse spotty sheep? Pied sheep? I'm sure it dealt with mixed colour (Jacobs-type) animals

As explained in the old book (and I can't remember the name or author) the whole song is a social commentary on the relative merits of coloured and white wool. In medieval times white wool was at a premium as it could be dyed, and as a result white sheep became predominant. Their fleeces were all taken for sale: either by the landowner, or the King or the Bishop as taxes. The black wool would be taken for monastic garments The peasant who raised the sheep was left with the small amount of brown or mixed colour wool that wasn't required by the overlords I also have half a memory that the later verses also dealt with the wool colours being handed out to the various monastic houses: i.e. black to the Dominicans, brown the Franciscans (who were major landowners)

As I said before, I've only given an approximation from a near fifty year old memory, so please don't take what I've written as exact. Olddemdike (talk) 01:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Its all very interesting, but without some reliable sources, there is not a lot we can add to the article. Most of these neat explanations are just speculation, we can note them as such if we have valid sources that outline them.--SabreBD (talk) 08:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

File:The Black sheep illustrated by William Wallace Denslow.jpg to appear as POTD soon

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:The Black sheep illustrated by William Wallace Denslow.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 29, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-12-29. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng {chat} 02:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Picture of the day

W. W. Denslow's illustration of "Baa, Baa, Black Sheep", a children's nursery rhyme that dates to 1744, when it was published in Tommy Thumb's Pretty Song Book. Since then, the words have remained mostly intact with few changes. The rhyme is sung to a variant of the 1761 French melody Ah! vous dirai-je, Maman, which is also used for "Twinkle Twinkle Little Star" and the alphabet song. As with many nursery rhymes, attempts have been made to find origins and meanings for the rhyme, but no theories have been definitively proven. Denslow's illustration accompanied a 1901 edition of Mother Goose.Restoration: Lise Broer

None for the little boy?

The way I know it, and as reported by Scholastic's The Real Mother Goose, the final stanza ends:

But none for the little boy

Who cries in the lane.

Should this be mentioned as an alternative? It certainly is a significant difference.

--Jason Fruit (talk) 16:54, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

I have to admit I have never heard that version, but significant alternatives are fine as long as they are properly sourced.--SabreBD (talk) 16:56, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Baa, Baa, Black Sheep/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sarastro1 (talk · contribs) 19:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

To be honest, I was reluctant to take this one as I did not think that the article could be comprehensive looking at its length. But having looked in several places, it looks like I am wrong and this article seems to sum up the thinking pretty well. Looking good.

• "It was first recorded in 1731.": Recorded is ambiguous here; the reader may assume recorded in the musical sense. And maybe combine with the the first sentence: ""Baa, Baa, Black Sheep" is an English nursery rhyme, the earliest surviving version of which dates from 1731.

 Done--SabreBD (talk) 22:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

• "Uncorroborated theories that have been advanced to explain the meaning of the rhyme include that it is a complaint against Medieval English taxes on wool and that it is about the slave trade.": The main body does not say that the all the theories are uncorroborated; also, this is a bit of a mouthful. Maybe "Explanations of the meaning of the rhyme have suggested it may be a complaint against Medieval English taxes on wool, or concerning the slave trade."

 Done--SabreBD (talk) 22:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

• Why quotation marks around "political correctness" (maybe worth a link?) A little too much like scare quotes.
• WP:MOSNUM: "twentieth century"→"20th century".

WP:ORDINAL says that century can be in words or figures.--SabreBD (talk) 22:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

• "It has been used in literature and popular culture.": A bit vague; used how? And a short, choppy sentence

 Done--SabreBD (talk) 22:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

• The page is wrong on ref 2, according to google books; should be p. 174.

 Done--SabreBD (talk) 22:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

• "have been collected across Great Britain and North America": Not supported by ref.

It is if you use the buttons to look at all the other versions.--SabreBD (talk) 22:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

• Given that the first two surviving versions are given, are there any theories (either about this specific nursery rhyme, or generic ones) how long it existed before this? (I appreciate this crosses over into the stuff about the theories of what it means)

Generally reliable commentators do not assume it is much older than the earliest reference. Probably cannot expand this without straying into original research.--SabreBD (talk) 22:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

• Page number wrong for ref 4 (according to google preview)? Also, seems to cross across 2 pages, and the linking of words and music is on the next page.

 Done--SabreBD (talk) 22:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

• "Katherine Elwes Thomas in The Real Personages of Mother Goose (1930) suggested that the rhyme referred to resentment at the heavy taxation on wool,[5] this has particularly been taken to refer to the medieval English 'Great' or 'Old Custom' wool tax of 1275, which survived until the fifteenth century." Suggest splitting this sentence after first wool.

 Done--SabreBD (talk) 19:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

• "However, this tax did not involve the collection of one-third to the king, and one-third to the church, but a less punitive sum of 6s 8d to the Crown per sack, about 5 per cent of the value.": Does this ref directly refer to "Baa baa"? Otherwise, this may be WP:OR, or at best, WP:SYNTHESIS.

I cannot get access to this passage so I am playing safe by deleting this.--SabreBD (talk) 19:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

• Several instances of single quotation marks, when WP:MOS requires double.

 Done--SabreBD (talk) 19:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

• Not completely convinced by the "linguistics" section, and not too clear what it means by "varieties of English".

I have no idea and I do not have access to the source to check. This is confusing in its current form, so I have removed it. If someone puts back a clearer version that is well and good.--SabreBD (talk) 19:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

• Images seem fine, although not sure of the value of Blacksheep2.

Having two Denslow images is probably overkill. I will try to find something from a contrasting period sometime in the future (I take it that is not really a GA issue).--SabreBD (talk) 19:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

• Spotchecks OK, apart from the minor issues above.
• As far as broad coverage is concerned, a check of the sources and elsewhere is giving me the same picture as this article, so it looks OK. I'm not sure if this would be enough for FA without checking further, but happy for GA. May be worth a check of places like JSTOR for more academic sources for the future.

Placing this on hold for now, but no big obstacles to passing. Sarastro1 (talk) 19:49, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Comment: This review has now been open for a week, and I think we need to see some progress very soon. Sarastro1 (talk) 21:47, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

I think that is everything. Let me know if I missed something.--SabreBD (talk) 19:24, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

OK, all looks good. Passing now. Sarastro1 (talk) 19:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks.--SabreBD (talk) 20:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)7

Political correctness crap

This article's interpretation that there was some sort of legitimate controversy surrounding actual amendments of the lyrics in accordance with PC values is not supported by the Loony Left which states that it was all the fabrication of British tabloids and subsequently reprinted over the years.

If Wikipedia is supposed to be taken seriously surely there should be parity between articles of the same subject? Considering the amount of detail on this topic, this article's version is as best biased and at worse factually incorrect. 23:31, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

That is odd, because I thought that is what this article does say.--SabreBD (talk) 22:50, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Trivia about the hidden meaning behind it

In swedish, the verse is sung as "bä bä vita lamm" which translates directly to "ba ba WHITE lamb".

The english verse was probably first though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.199.120.209 (talk) 10:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Black sheep idiom

Does this nursery rhyme have anything to do with black sheep's usage as a bad or sticking out person? (As in He is the black sheep of the family; he never goes to church.) 68.61.163.252 (talk) 23:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC) high schooler

The first known record of "black sheep"' in a derogatory sense is from the writings of the aptly named Thomas Shephard (1605-1649), a Puritan who emigrated from England to America in 1635. In his evangelical text, The Sincere Convert (1640), he writes:

"Cast out all the Prophane people among us, as drunkards, swearers, whores, lyers, which the Scripture brands for blacke sheepe, and condemnes them in a 100 places."

Strangely, even though the expression black sheep of the family had negative connotations from at least this period, it appears that the black sheep themselves were considered by some as good omens right up until the late 19th century.

https://www.bookbrowse.com/expressions/detail/index.cfm/expression_number/673/the-black-sheep-of-the-family Diablo666Daemon666 (talk) 03:43, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

This song received its own tune

This song received its own tune, and is no longer commonly sung in the tune Ah vous dirai-je, Maman. Should we add this information to this article? Yusheng02 (talk) 09:12, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Tune

Well, I only learnt that song in a foreign school, but I'm quite convinced that our tone was a different one.The article now has

g1 g1 d2 d2 e2 e2 e2 e2 d2

baa baa black sheep, have you any wool

We sang, possibly transposed to also start in g1,

g1 g1 d2 d2 e2 d2 f#2 e2 d2

baa baa black sheep, have you any wool

It is just possible that "have you any wool" was repeated. Then the text has

d2 d2 d2 c2 c2 b1 b1 b1 a1 1/4-break d2 d2 d2 c2 c2 c2 c2 b1 b1 b1 a1

One for the master, one for the dame, one for the little boy who lived down the lane

We sang

d2 d2 d2 c2 c2 b1-a1 d2 b1 a1 1/8-break d2 d2 d2 d2 c2 d2 e2 c2 b1 a1 a1 g1

One for my master, one for my dame, and one for the little boy who lived down the lane.--2001:A61:260D:6E01:91A1:633F:1952:4EBA (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

You haven't specified where you learned the song. This is the tune I was brought up with (in southern England) and the only tune I know:

It seems to be the same as yours except for the third line, which is the same as the third line of the version in the article.

The article also doesn't indicate where in the world the version it gives is common, or even that the usual tune varies from region to region. We need to redress the balance somehow.... — Smjg (talk) 13:03, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

why a black sheep

When you look at mortality in prior centuries, you understand how valuable black wool was. Linen and cotton came in ecru and white, not black; you had to dye them at some point. But black wool could go straight from sheep to clothing in say a week. There were standard size wool sacks, 40 x 90 inches holding 350 pounds by the standards of 1300 CE. It takes up to 10 pounds of wool to make a man's suit or two lady's dresses with long skirts. So baa baa black sheep could put 35 men and seventy ladies into mourning and that's a reasonable ratio considering that men died younger or that soldier mortality was extremely high from all causes. The little boy in the lane wouldn't need a sack of wool to himself since 50% of births resulted in a death by age 5 and half the survivors died by age 15. In medieval times, mostly men went to funerals, some of them being the pallbearers. 100.15.117.34 (talk) 18:21, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Re: 'See also' pages

Why is Gotye's Somebody I Used to Know in the see also for this page? What's the correlation? Max Epper (talk) 03:15, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

The Somebody That I Used to Know article states it's a song that samples an instrumental track from another album in which the underlying melody is taken from a Xylophone version of the nursery rhyme. I'm removing the entry as far too distant a connection to be listed. MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:01, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Original Rhyme

The rhyme is certainly not about slavery, but it IS about discrimination in another form.

It's actually about the CLASS DIVIDE, and the original lyrics reflect this:

Baa Baa Black Sheep, Have you any Wool? Yes, Sir, Yes, Sir, three bags full. One for the Master, one for the Dame, and none for the little boy who lives down the Lane.

The Master and the Dame are richer and therefore could afford Wool products, which were considered luxury goods and therefore expensive for a time. The "little boy" is poor and cannot afford it. Strangely enough, about 20 years ago, this could be proved as correct. Alas, as with a lot of English Cultural History, any information regarding this has simply disappeared.

Also, Edit Request: You have a section regarding "Yes sir, yes sir, three bags full, sir" as something people often say when a subordinate...? Is this not actually "yes sir, no sir, three bags full, sir"...that's certainly what it was when I was growing up, and for my Parents and Grandparents too. Perhaps that's just a Lincolnshire (or more localised) version though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-33639-83 (talk) 02:33, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

You need to provide sources for your claims. CambridgeBayWeather (#1 deranged), Uqaqatigijaa (talk), Huliva 02:45, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

That was exactly my point, sources for such things are disappearing every year, and you are asking me to provide them.

A factual source being removed does not mean it never existed.

Every person in England, for many generations knew this fact. Hell, it was my Grandparents that told me, and about 20 years ago I could find the information to back up the claim.

As I said, English Cultural Heritage being erased piece by piece...even here it seems. ~2026-33639-83 (talk) 02:59, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

"Every person in England, for many generations knew this fact." No they didn't, read below. I was born in 1956 and lived in the UK until 1974 and never heard "Yes sir, yes sir, three bags full, sir", "yes sir, no sir, three bags full, sir", or "and none for the little boy who lives down the Lane." As you said it sounds like something from a particular area in Lincolnshire. As you must remember in those days there were large variations in speech between area's a few miles apart. That too would explain the lack of sources between your version and the one in this article. CambridgeBayWeather (#1 deranged), Uqaqatigijaa (talk), Huliva 03:12, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

The "Yes, Sir" and "No, Sir" bits are not about the actual rhyme.

They are from another section in the article, with regards to sarcastic responses to orders. Diablo666Daemon666 (talk) 04:32, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

There is no mention of "no sir" in the article/ CambridgeBayWeather (#1 deranged), Uqaqatigijaa (talk), Huliva 04:36, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

In the main Article about the Rhyme...

Notable cultural references:

The phrase "yes sir, yes sir, three bags full, sir" has been used in reference to an obsequious or craven subordinate. It is attested from 1910, and originally was common in the British Royal Navy.

This I usually have heard as "Yes, Sir, No, Sir, Three Bags Full, Sir". It is a sarcastic remark in response to being given an order, or when discussing Private Soldiers communicating with Officers and NCO's. Diablo666Daemon666 (talk) 06:36, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

I have a pointing source for the "None for the little boy" part...

--The original 18th-century lyrics to Baa, Baa, Black Sheep actually ended with a complaint about poverty, stating "And none for the little boy who cries down the lane", rather than the modern, happier line "And one for the little boy who lives down the lane".--

The hyperlink to the website is: https://www.storiespreschool.com/nursery_rhyme_black_sheep.html but the website has been edited as this whole paragraph no longer appears.

Diablo666Daemon666 (talk) 03:16, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

And that's a really good example of why you shouldn't trust AI. It says "The original 18th-century lyrics" but Baa, Baa, Black Sheep#Origin and meaning disagrees and comes with sources. CambridgeBayWeather (#1 deranged), Uqaqatigijaa (talk), Huliva 04:39, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

I often mistrust AI responses, but this one seems spot on to me. It also points to websites that seem to have been changed since their publication. If it still points to them as the source for that information, then the sites must have originally contained such information.

As someone said above "Erasing English Cultural Heritage, piece by piece".

It seems nobody wants anyone to know the true lines of...an old Nursery Rhyme?

Much like the removal of references to Slavery in various forms, especially in England. Which is strange since we spearheaded the end of the Atlantic Slave Trade.

Strangely enough, you can still find the information that, in the 12 Days Of Christmas, it was "Four Colly Birds". Diablo666Daemon666 (talk) 06:45, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

But the original lyrics from 1744 don't say what AI says. Later lyrics from 21 years later in 1765 do say the same thing that AI has. As to you says that the websites have changed their wording that's what Wikipedia calls original research and isn't permitted. "If it still points to them as the source for that information, then the sites must have originally contained such information." could just be AI slop that it has hallucinated or the websites did contain the information that whoever wrote it realised it was an error. As to Slavery in Britain (with a lot of sources showing that slavery did exist) and the The Twelve Days of Christmas (song) (colly birds were from a Somerset dialect meaning blackbirds and why would that be strange?) they have little to do with this and are just red herrings. There is no great conspiracy to suppress the heritage of the UK. That sounds like a fantasy that someone like Tommy Robinson or members of UKIP would entertain. CambridgeBayWeather (#1 deranged), Uqaqatigijaa (talk), Huliva 07:10, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

That's a very naive view of the state of the Country, especially when there is sufficient evidence to show that certain aspects of our Culture and Heritage are disappearing, but fair enough, we can chalk that one up as irrelevant to the current discussion.

As to Baa Baa Black Sheep, it was recorded across many websites that the lyrics were "And none for the little boy who lived down the lane".

Baa, Baa, Black Sheep...

"This classic nursery rhyme has attracted recent controversy as it was believed to be politically incorrect, but most scholars agree that it has little to do with the Slave Trade. The most common conclusion is that it’s actually about the Great Custom, which was a Tax on Wool in the 13th century. Under the new Taxes the price of a sack of Wool was split between the Farmer, King and Church. It takes on sinister connotations if you consider that the original last line was ‘And none for the little boy 
who cries down the lane’, indicating that the poor shepherd boys were left with no profits due to the heavy tax."

https://www.historyanswers.co.uk/news/the-deadly-effects-of-victorian-fashion/

"The nursery rhyme was originally printed in Tommy Thumb’s Pretty Song Book, which is the oldest surviving collection of English language nursery rhymes, from 1744. The lyrics are very similar to the modern version, and they go like this:

Bah, Bah, a black Sheep,

Have you any wool?

Yes old mate I have

Three bags full,

Two for my master,

One for my dame,

None for the little boy

That cries in the lane."

https://americansongwriter.com/behind-the-meaning-of-the-nursery-rhyme-baa-baa-black-sheep/

"The Meaning: The Great Custom of 1275

The most widely accepted historical meaning of the rhyme is that it serves as a complaint against oppressive taxation. Specifically, it refers to the "Great Custom," a heavy tax on wool introduced by King Edward I in 1275 to fund his military campaigns.

The wool industry was the backbone of the English economy during the Middle Ages. The new tax system essentially demanded that the revenue from a farmer's wool be divided into thirds:

"One for the master": The King (Edward I), who took a third as tax.

"One for the dame": The Church or the local nobility, who took another third.

"And one for the little boy who lives down the lane": The poor farmer who actually raised the sheep and sheared the wool, left with a meager final third to survive on.

In older, bleaker versions of the rhyme from 1744, the lyrics ended with "None for the little boy / That cries in the lane," emphasizing that the heavy taxation left the common people with absolutely nothing."

https://nurseryrhymes.info/baa-baa-black-sheep/ Diablo666Daemon666 (talk) 08:57, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

My parents and grandparents were from Cleethorpes and I only ever heard the "Yes sir, yes sir, three bags full;" (certainly never with the additional "sir" at the end). The source confirms this. In addition it was always "And one for the little boy" but never none for the boy. CambridgeBayWeather (#1 deranged), Uqaqatigijaa (talk), Huliva 02:53, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

"Yes, Sir, No, Sir, Three Bags Full, Sir"

https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/three+bags+full

Also used in the TV Series "Porridge", so fairly well known, I'd say?. Diablo666Daemon666 (talk) 03:22, 14 June 2026 (UTC)