Talk:Angry Birds Star Wars/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: SleepyRedHair (talk · contribs) 13:35, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 11:18, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi! I will be reviewing this article, expect the initial remarks soon! Vestrian24Bio 11:18, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• EARWIG shows 10.7% - violation unlikely.
• According to link-dispenser (permalink),
  • 14 refs need archive urls.

Vestrian24Bio 11:25, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Just checked the link dispenser, I'm not sure how to resolve the archive URLs issue as I have never added one or used this tool before. Is adding them required for the GA assessment to continue, and if so, how do I add the necessary archive URLs? Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 17:55, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

It's not a necessary although it's suggested. Run the page on iabot and it will add possible archives, make sure to tick the "add archives to live pages" box as well. Vestrian24Bio 09:05, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. However, I have tried loading the webpage multiple times, including after clearing browser cache, and it has only lead to a 504 gateway crash each time. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 13:43, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I noticed you use bot on the article yourself, thank you for doing so! I'd like to ask something important: I was researching sources to use when I start working on improving the Angry Birds Star Wars II article and accidentally found a few additional sources that can be used to add additional material to this article, including sales figures for the mobile version and the inclusion of the Lando bird. Is it okay if I implement this before the review continues, or is it too late? Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 14:06, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

The bot had some sort of a problem for the past few weeks, It only started working from Today morning and I had a dozen of articles to do, so I just thought I'll cover this as well, while I'm on it.

I'll hold the review, while you add the new content. Ping me when you are done, and then I'll continue. Vestrian24Bio 16:17, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

@Vestrian24Bio Done! Thanks for waiting, that should be the last content I could possibly add for now. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 17:34, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

• The lead should mention that the 2012 release "was for mobile and PCs" before being ported by Activision.
• C-3PO dividing into smaller pieces, is it similar to that of the blue birds..?
• WP:DUPELINKs:
  • Death Star in Development and release section (x2).
  • Lando Calrissian in Development and release section.
  • Palpatine in Development and release section.
  • iOS in Reception section.
  • Wii U in Reception section.
  • PlayStation 3 in Reception section.
  • PlayStation 4 in Reception section.
  • PlayStation Vita in Reception section.
• In the Awards table, could link to 2014 Kids' Choice Awards directly..
• There's a duplicated ref - 8&23

@SleepyRedHair: that's all I got, ping me when done. Vestrian24Bio 13:09, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

@Vestrian24Bio The suggested edits have been made, let me know if I missed anything. Regarding the C-3PO comment, the ability is somewhat similar to the Blues (that's their collective nickname) but not quite the same, not to mention the Blues are represented in this game as the Jedi Pilots. However, I could not find any of that in any sources, so I did not include it to avoid WP:OR. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 18:07, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Final review

• Both files have proper copyright tags.
  • File:Angry Birds Star Wars.png - all good.
  • File:Angry Birds Star Wars Gameplay.gif - missing alt text.

Vestrian24Bio 13:16, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

• Source spot-check: pass Vestrian24Bio 13:09, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

All else good, passing for GA. Vestrian24Bio 13:09, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.