Talk:Ado Ekiti

Latest comment: 9 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Deleted sections

edit

It is unethical to delete what others post to be verified facts, and substitute false and misleading self aggrandizing opinions in its place. Any hagiographic adulation is not the intent and purpose of Wikipedia which is increasingly being used as source of academic information. I attempted to do some overall clean-up of the article, during which I removed the following sections. The first could become its own article and be linked to from this one, but it should have a source. The second seems overly detailed; we don't need to know the name of every professor/doctor in town. If someone who knows more could choose the dozen or so names that are the most important, we could put them back in (preferably with sources).

 Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesgles (talkcontribs) 00:48, 19 November 2012‎ (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ado Ekiti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply