Talk:AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability of a separate article for a CPU model

Latest comment: 2 months ago6 comments5 people in discussion

I reckon it would be better to turn this page into a redirect, like the page for its predecessor is one: Ryzen 9 7950X3D MonAx (talk) 03:35, 18 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

The article is now long enough and features enough reliable sources to justify an own article. Maxeto0910 (talk) 04:51, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I did turn the article into a redirect once; however, upon second thought, the subject does seem to meet the notability guidelines, as there is quite a bit of significant coverage on the subject from sources that are independent and reliable. So I'm not even gonna bother taking it to AfD. I know this article is unusual, as there has pretty much never been an article on a singular CPU model released from the 2000s onwards.

Now the question is, how to take care of the rest of the CPU models/series. Wikipedia does not seem to have any coverage on the reviews of the various Ryzen generations (e.g. 1000 series, 3000 series) and how significant they were at the time (the value and performance war relative to Intel). I'm thinking of one day creating separate articles for each major Ryzen generation. However, the problem to that is they'll seem like close copies of the CPU architectural articles, such as Zen 2, Zen 3, Zen 4. In other words, there'll be quite a bit of overlap between them, due to the SKU list tables, making them feel redundant. So I'm not sure how best to handle this. — AP 499D25 (talk) 23:38, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

IMO, this page should be a redirect to a larger Ryzen 9000-series or Zen5 articles. Many of the citations are repetitive and generic. Equivalent articles could be written for 9950X, 9950X3D, and 9950X3D2 as new halo products for this family are released. Dbsseven (talk) 09:03, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Many of the citations are repetitive and generic.

That doesn't matter: Reception is reception. If that was a valid argument, most smartphones wouldn't deserve an own article, including highly popular ones like iPhones or Samsung Galaxy S models. Maxeto0910 (talk) 23:45, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Keep, see above. --Zac67 (talk) 16:53, 7 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Add topic