Talk:2011 Australian Open

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Former good article nominee2011 Australian Open was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 13, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
March 28, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on January 30, 2011.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Rally for Relief

edit

Per Federer's Facebook page: This Sunday at 2p on Rod Laver Arena we are going to do a charity match called "Rally for Relief" to help raise money for the relief efforts for the devastating floods in Queensland. Lots of the games stars will participate. It should be a lot of fun.

I think this merits a mention comme Hit For Haiti last yr. --Madchester (talk) 05:00, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Done and added how players are raising money in other ways leading up to the AO which are not orgainsed by TA. KnowIG (talk) 12:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2011 Australian Open/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:

Matters got rather out of control in (and as a result of) the review above; GOP has agreed to withdraw from the review, so the best thing is for a new reviewer to start again with a clean slate. BencherliteTalk 14:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2011 Australian Open/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AGK [] 12:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hey. Noting that the writer's indef-blocked, but if the only concerns with the article are minor I can take a stab at it. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:25, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Failed "good article" nomination

edit

This article failed its good article nomination. This is how the article, as of March 28, 2011, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?:  Fail – The quality of writing within this article, and especially in the lead, is poor. The lead does not seem to provide an overview of the subject matter (as it should, per WP:LEAD).
2. Factually accurate?:  Pass – No obvious inaccuracies, and sourcing is fine.
3. Broad in coverage?:  Pass – Covers most obvious aspects of the subject.
4. Neutral point of view?:  Pass – Article uses a neutral point of view throughout.
5. Article stability?  Pass – Article is not subject to rapid changes or edit warring at present, and is not about a current event.
6. Images?:  Pass – Good volume of images, spread sensibly throughout the article.

The quality of writing within this article is so poor as to be distracting to the reader. Even controlling for the allowance for not necessarily perfect prose that is written into the GA criteria, this article does not meet the requirements, and would require, in my view, a sizeable investment of effort if another GA nomination were to be successful.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— AGK [] 15:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Tables

edit

Given they aren't visible by default they seem well worth including. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:16, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Edit request from 2.37.139.96, 23 June 2011

edit

There are many errors in the single players

2.37.139.96 (talk) 07:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sources need to be found then :). -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 07:46, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Can you list a few so they can be fixed? Just saying there's errors doesn't help us very much. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:16, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Edit request on 28 January 2012

edit

{{edit semi-protected}}

The players are listed as having won GRAND SLAMS. This is VERY inaccurate. This tournament is a MAJOR TOURNAMENT. It takes winning 4 in a calendar year to win a GRAND SLAM--not just one major. Rod Laver and only a handful of others, in the entire history of the game, are the only ones to win Grand Slams. 75.211.188.164 (talk) 02:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

"Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".  Chzz    03:18, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2011 Australian Open. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2011 Australian Open. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:46, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2011 Australian Open. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply