Talk:1972 Sacramento Canadair Sabre accident

Latest comment: 2 months ago by TarnishedPath in topic Requested move 26 March 2026
Former good article nominee1972 Sacramento Canadair Sabre accident was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 27, 2021Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 4, 2014.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that 22 people were killed in 1972 when a Canadair Sabre crashed into an ice cream parlour in Sacramento?


Requested move 26 March 2026

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) TarnishedPathtalk 07:41, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply


1972 Sacramento Canadair Sabre accidentFarrell's Ice Cream Parlor disaster – Multiple sources cited in the article referred to this accident as "Farrell's disaster" or "Farrell's crash" or other similar labelling other than the one we currently use which referred to the city. Since this is a one of a kind accident (involving air show aircraft crashing into unrelated civilian building), I think this should be changed accordingly to reflect the key point of this disaster. NotKringe (talk) 11:29, 26 March 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 06:42, 2 April 2026 (UTC)  Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 08:40, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Holding off for now Oppose unless you got sources calling it "Farrell's Ice Cream Parlor disaster". If there isn't a WP:COMMONNAME for it we would do better sticking to standard naming conventions. ―Maltazarian (talkinvestigate) 15:34, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
To be honest, there isn't any source which specifically used that name, but other sources referring to it along the line of that name.
  • Flight Journal referring to it as "Farrell's crash". (1)
  • The Sacramento Bee referring to it as "Farrell's jet-crash" or "Farrell's disaster". (1) (2)
  • Check Six referring to it as "The Crash at Farrel's Ice Cream Parlor". (1)
Since all the aforementioned sources referred to Farrell's as the key point of the disaster (as this is where the casualties were found), I think this can be condensed into the proposed title or similar alternative. NotKringe (talk) 17:10, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hmm, after searching around and also seeing the article 2002 Pirelli Tower airplane crash I'm more persuaded by your argument. I was basing my response off a bunch of different policies and guidelines here and most of them are intentionally vague so it gets a bit messy. The starting point is WP:NCE which gives a style guide on naming articles on events, and has a guide for aviation accidents in it, and we should be following that unless it's overruled by WP:COMMONNAME, but if 2002 Pirelli Tower airplane crash is fine despite there not being many sources outright calling it that then 1972 Farrel's Ice Cream Parlor airplane crash might be fine. We do have to keep the 1972 per WP:NCWWW. Usually the length of the title would be an issue here but the current title is also long so it shouldn't be a WP:CRITERIA conciseness issue. Hopefully we will get some more input because I feel a bit unsure now honestly. ―Maltazarian (talkinvestigate) 17:44, 26 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject California and WikiProject Aviation have been notified of this discussion. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 06:42, 2 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • Leaning opposed (in the primary proposed phrasing): The word "disaster" is non-neutral and should only be used with evidence that it is a dominant "common name". Airline accident experts should chime in on what phrasing is typically preferred on Wikipedia, but I suggest some phrase using "accident" or "crash", probably including the year. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 15:14, 8 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Disaster management has been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPathtalk 08:42, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sources

edit