Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 8 February 2026 by Pythoncoder (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.
Declined by Pythoncoder 4 months ago.LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. |
Type of site | Web-based meta-analysis platform |
|---|---|
| Available in | English |
| Created by | János Tibor Fekete; Balázs Győrffy |
| URL | https://metaanalysisonline.com |
| Commercial | no |
| Registration | Not required |
| Launched | 2024 |
MetaAnalysisOnline is a web-based statistical platform for conducting meta-analyses of clinical and epidemiological studies.[1] The platform was developed at Semmelweis University and first described in a peer-reviewed publication in 2025.[1] A conference abstract describing the tool was presented at the 2024 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.[2]
Description
editAccording to Fekete and Győrffy (2025), the platform implements fixed-effect and random-effects meta-analysis models, including Mantel–Haenszel, inverse-variance weighting, and DerSimonian–Laird methods.[1] The publication reports support for binary outcomes, continuous variables, and time-to-event data.[1] The same study describes calculation of heterogeneity statistics, including I² and τ², and generation of graphical outputs such as forest plots and funnel plots.[1]
Use in published research
editThe platform has been cited in independent peer-reviewed research. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in Applied Sciences reported use of MetaAnalysisOnline for statistical calculations in the evaluation of melatonin quantification in wine.[3] A study published in Scientific Reports investigating associations between sleep imbalance and mortality outcomes cited the use of web-based meta-analytic tools including MetaAnalysisOnline.[4]
== See also == * Meta-analysis * Systematic review
== References ==
- 1 2 3 4 5 Fekete, János Tibor; Győrffy, Balázs (2025). "MetaAnalysisOnline.com: Web-Based Tool for the Rapid Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Epidemiological Studies". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 27: e64016. doi:10.2196/64016. PMC 11926438. PMID 39928123.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link) - ↑ Győrffy, Balázs; Fekete János Tibor (2024). "MetaAnalysisOnline.com: A new bioinformatic tool for the meta-analysis of clinical trials". Journal of Clinical Oncology. 42 (16_suppl): e23012. doi:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.e23012.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link) - ↑ Eremia, S. A. V. (2025). "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Melatonin Quantification in Wine". Applied Sciences. 15 (14): 7755. doi:10.3390/app15147755.
- ↑ Palicz, T. (2025). "Imbalanced sleep increases mortality risk by 14–34%: a meta-analysis". Scientific Reports.
== External links == * Official website
Category:Bioinformatics Category:Medical statistics Category:Web applications

- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.