Wikipedia talk:Contact us
 | This talk page is not the place to ask questions, to report errors, or to contact Wikipedia.
This page is for discussion of the Contact us page itself.
|
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Contact us page. |
|
 | To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, all talk pages of subpages of Wikipedia:Contact us redirect here. See the histories of each talk page for discussions prior to 26 September 2010. |
 | Wikipedia:Contact us is indefinitely protected from editing as it is a page that should not be edited significantly for legal or other reasons. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit protected}} to notify an administrator to make the requested edit.
|
 | Wikipedia:Contact us is a reader-facing page intended for viewing by non-editors. Please prioritize their needs when adjusting its design, and move editor-facing elements to other pages. |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Adding a link to the WMF Legal and Safety Contact page
Per the recent WMF notice and its FAQ, this page should include a link to wmf:Legal:Wikimedia Foundation Legal and Safety Contact Information. Any thoughts on how best to integrate it? jlwoodwa (talk) 23:25, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
- There's now a Legal and Safety contact link at the very bottom of every WP page, below the CCA-SA notice. FactOrOpinion (talk) 17:56, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
- The FAQ requests that
If wikis have existing “Contact” pages and links, the community will update these to prevent confusion.
I agree with this – someone reading this page could reasonably expect to find the relevant WMF contact link within the page's content. jlwoodwa (talk) 01:09, 27 December 2025 (UTC)- Agree an addition should be made here. You're an admin; you're welcome to add one. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:11, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Pppery, @Jlwoodwa thank you for helping with this. Happy holidays. - STei (WMF) (talk) 12:31, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
- Hi all - just following up on this. @Jlwoodwa, is it something you wanted to do? PBradley-WMF (talk) 10:17, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Pppery, @Jlwoodwa thank you for helping with this. Happy holidays. - STei (WMF) (talk) 12:31, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
- Agree an addition should be made here. You're an admin; you're welcome to add one. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:11, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
- The FAQ requests that
Translation from Arabic to English
البشارات ببعثة الرسول محمد البشارات ببعثة النبي محمد في كتابي التوراة و الإنجيل
The above Wikipedia page is available only in Arabic. I would like to read the English language version of the same article/page please . Thank you. WaleedAhmadAddas (talk) 18:51, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Edit request 6 April 2026
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the image in Wikipedia:Contact us/Article subjects to File:Wiki talk tab Vector 2022.png, because it is highly likely that one will be using the Vector 2022 skin instead of Vector 2010 if they are an article subject, because it is the default skin, and you cannot change it unless you log in. Few article subjects have Wikipedia accounts, and even fewer use a skin other than Vector 2022.
Diff:
| − | [[File:Wiki talk tab.png|thumb|right|Location of the talk page tab]] | + | [[File:Wiki talk tab Vector 2022.png|thumb|right|Location of the talk page tab]] |
Let "Autobiographies" be accepted sources!
Hey!
I would like to make a proposal to make "autobiographies" accepted sources!
It is one of the most fundamental and basic sources one can find, namely the people involved's own experiences and their own knowledge about themselves and their lives. Empirical research could be something similar.
It is a unique opportunity to be able to take part in a type of first-hand knowledge, as with own experience, and empirical research.
There are plenty of examples of autobiographies in literature, and which can also be used as source material.
People like Winston Churchill, Adolf Hitler, and many more can be mentioned.
With regards
Martin Vikene RobynMartinX (talk) 09:32, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Let "Wikipedia" be A.I. controlled!
I propose that Wikipedia should be A.I. controlled, so that the system becomes more fair.
This is especially to prevent individuals from being able to sabotage and delete content from other individuals that they may not like, based on their own preferences and opinions. The Wikipedia system should be more neutral and objective. It is difficult to achieve this with individual individuals' own assessments, which may be based on their own selfish opinions and perceptions.
An A.I. controlled Wikipedia would be more fair and neutral!
How to achieve this? By making Wikipedia automated according to certain standardized criteria. It is enough with 3 - 4 criteria, such as neutral/objective format, source references, plausibility, and coherence, perhaps with more. This should be able to be checked and controlled by A.I. .
Should there be disputes about content, it can be taken to special neutral committees, possibly like the legal system in general society. RobynMartinX (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2026 (UTC)