Talk:Gymnastics at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's artistic individual all-around

Latest comment: 1 year ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination

Disputed all around results

edit

The numbers are off from athletes 15 and down, For example Kristin Maloney scored 9.543 on the vault. Please see http://www.gymnasticsresults.com/2000/o2000w.html  Preceding unsigned comment added by MATThematical (talkcontribs) 17:52, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Gymnastics at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's artistic individual all-around/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 02:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 19:18, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply


After you reviewed a few of my GAs a feel it's only right to return the favour :) IAWW (talk) 19:18, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

I made a few copyedits I didn't feel worth discussing, feel free to revert any issues. IAWW (talk) 19:19, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your review It is a wonderful world! I believe I have addressed all of your comments. -Riley1012 (talk) 23:26, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks @Riley1012, I think you did a great job of addressing my concerns, especially on the comments regarding neutrality. I think this article is now ready to pass. Congrats! IAWW (talk) 00:00, 24 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Prose (Criteria 1a, 1b, 4) Magenta clockclock

edit

Lead

edit

Could you add a brief summary of what the "all-around" is? Including what events they compete in, and what a "rotation" (referred to later in the article) is. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Suggest linking "Romania" to Romania at the 2000 Summer Olympics. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Suggest adding which nation Olaru and Xuan competed for, and linking the nations as above. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Background

edit

Suggest linking Russian as above. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Suggest adding in the prose what nation Viktoria Karpenko was competing for. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Qualification results

edit

Looks good ;)

Competition summary and vault height controversy

edit

The countries could be linked as above.

This difference in height was enough to throw off a gymnast's timing and technique:

  • WP:NPOV: "avoid stating opinion as fact". I suggest attributing to expert consensus, or a specific expert.
  • There is an issue with tense here too. The word "was" is past tense, but "a gymnast's timing and technique" is a general idea. I suggest replacing "a" with "the". IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

It could cause gymnasts to miss the contact between their hands and the vaulting horse, which had the potential to cause serious injures: Another tense inconsistency. It would be good to attribute this to an expert or consensus. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

During the third rotation, Khorkina, who had not heard about the chance to re-do her vault, fell off the uneven bars: How is the option to re-do her vault related to her fall on the uneven bars? IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ray, also rattled from her mistakes on the vault: Opinion, attribute IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

allowing her to jump up 21 places in the standings: "allowing her" is a bit indirect. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Suggest linking the first instances the individual events are mentioned. I think it is quite likely the reader will want to know more about them. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Romanian gymnast Andreea Răducan initially won the gold medal while her teammates, Simona Amânar and Maria Olaru won silver and bronze, respectively: Add a comma after the names to separate the non-restrictive appositive. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Andreea Răducan doping

edit

Suggest linking "common cold" IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

she did not fail the doping test because she weighed more than Răducan: Opinion, attribute IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

The gold medal and silver medals: Do you mean "The gold and silver medals"? IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

was bumped up to the bronze medal: This doesn't quite make sense, because the bronze medal is not a position itself, but rather an award for finishing in third position. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Suggest linking "IOC president" IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Dong Fangxiao age falsification

edit

at the time of the Olympic Games: I think be precise that it was the 2000 Olympics. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Final results

edit

It looks really ugly having the references under the table like that, could they be added to a table caption to make it look better? IAWW (talk) 19:18, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Aftermath

edit

The FIG also noted that the officials responsible were reprimanded but did not reveal the details: I think "stated" is more neutral than "noted" here. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sources Magenta clockclock

edit

Health/formatting (Criterion 2a) checkY

edit

No current issues with link rot, but it would be nice if all links were archived to prevent issues in the future. Everything is formatted nicely. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reliability (Criterion 2b) checkY

edit

All large newspapers, official reports, reliable athlete websites and subject specialist magazines/websites. I don't see any issues.

Spot check (Criteria 2b, 2c, 2d) Magenta clockclock

edit

Spot check based on this version.

[1a]: The source doesn't say she was the favourite, and even if it did it would be an opinion and would need attribution. IAWW (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

[1b]: checkY

[6a]: checkY

[7a]: checkY

[10b, 13]: checkY

[17]: checkY

[18c]: checkY

[27]: checkY

[31a, 32]: checkY

[41]: checkY

Copyvio (Criterion 2d) checkY

edit

Earwig detects nothing, and all the sources are online so it is very unlikely it missed anything.

Scope (Criteria 3a, 3b) checkY

edit

It would be nice if there was some coverage of reputable media's reaction to the controversies, but I don't think this is needed for GA. IAWW (talk) 20:04, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Stable (Criterion 5) checkY

edit

Media checkY

edit

No good images on Commons unfortunately.

Tags (Criterion 6a) checkY

edit

Captions (Criterion 6b) checkY

edit

Suggestions (not needed for GA promotion)

edit
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 20:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

    • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Riley1012 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

7kk (talk) 19:04, 30 March 2025 (UTC).Reply

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.
    Overall: Article was promoted to GA status within one week of its nomination. It is long enough and Earwig does not show that copyright violations are probable. QPQ not required, as this is one of your first five submissions. The hook is interesting and cited. Overall, I see no reason not to approve this submission. JJonahJackalope (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply