Talk:3

Latest comment: 4 days ago by Imaginatorium in topic This is incorrect!

Nikola Tesla Quote

edit

I could not find any valid source for the quote by Nikola Tesla under the Philosophy section. It may be misleading and should be removed unless someone can find a valid source for this statement. --CarsExtendedWarranty (talk) 22:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Number Theory I

edit

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 September 2024 and 15 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aabratcher98 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Aabratcher98 (talk) 17:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Citations for "Religion and beliefs"

edit

@Kuru Sorry to directly mention you, I'm not sure what the common practice is in terms of mentioning. I appreciate you linking the wikipedia abbr for why you removed the source/citation on the "Three on a Match" chunk. I ended up going back to look for more sources, and I was wondering if this 1984 newspaper article was worth anything? The column starts on page 57 of the PDF viewer, page C1 of the newspaper itself and ends on page 112 of the PDF viewer, page C6 of the newspaper. There is also a digitized/typed version of the column for archive reasons here

Another good reference might be this 1935 newspaper article that is both a super interesting read and a potential source!

If you have any thoughts or feedback it's greatly appreciated as I am very new to this! EM 1NH3 (talk) 20:00, 6 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

The ping/notice worked perfectly - well done. NYT and SMH are solid sources; feel free to add those. There appears to be a large number of sources on the Three on a match page that could be used here as well. Sam Kuru (talk) 20:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Using as a variable

edit

In the "List of basic calculations" section, it uses as a variable. This is not correct notation, because x was not defined 4.26.67.90 (talk) 19:03, 16 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Also the table is causing the page to grow longer horizontally.4.26.67.90 (talk) 19:12, 16 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
I find it fairly clear from context that is the value in the column header, but would something like this be better?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 50 100 1000 10000
3 × 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 75 150 300 3000 30000
Barnards.tar.gz (talk) 19:30, 16 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

"√9" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

The redirect √9 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 1 § Square root redirects until a consensus is reached. Deacon Vorbis (carbon  videos) 16:30, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

This is incorrect!

edit

In this article it states that three is the smallest prime number 2 is the smallest with its factors only being one and itself if you know how to edit and fix this please do. ~2026-32448-46 (talk) 14:12, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

No, the article says it is the smallest odd prime number, which is true, even if you think this is a bit silly, as I do. Imaginatorium (talk) 14:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply