Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cheek-lined wrasse

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2026 at 03:13:48 (UTC)

Support as nominator – MER-C 03:13, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:16, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unsure Quite blurry, but it's underwater, which calls for somewhat lower standards. @Charlesjsharp: Your thoughts as a photographer? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 20:43, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
support yes, very different standards. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support then. Thanks. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.8% of all FPs.} 22:39, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely a lower subsea sharpness standard, but I'd still suggest sharpening the background a bit. Jay Cubby 19:01, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:44, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Giles Laurent (talk) 08:54, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
comment Is this an adult? The article says they are meant to grow to 40cm and I'm having a hard time working out the scale.©Geni (talk) 23:37, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Comparing with search engine photo results, this one is all brownish image where the fish is hard to identify. Low ev due background, the fish should be actually quite colourful. Adult, male or female? Stub article. —kallerna 08:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Barbanegra rayado (Oxycheilinus digramma), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-24, DD 51.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:11, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]