Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cameroon
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Cameroon and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
| Archives: 1 |
| This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Insurgency question
editWhat is the relationship of the Bakassi conflict and Anglo crisis? Thanks. Bokoharamwatch (talk) 07:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
African women’s football teams
editSee here. And this too --- here. Btw happy unification day, Cameroun. Bokoharamwatch (talk) 11:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Women's teams in general
See AfroBasket 2021. Bokoharamwatch (talk) 12:35, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Cup
editMore on this topic, like to draw footy lovers to aisha Buhari Cup. Bokoharamwatch (talk) 11:05, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources
editI have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Charles Atangana Featured article review
editI have nominated Charles Atangana for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
editQuality assessments are used by Wikipedia editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon
edit
Hello WikiProject Cameroon:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 12:48, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Starting this July, we will see a new contest on the scene - the Developing Countries WikiContest (WP:DCWC)! Think of it as a WikiCup but only for articles and media on developing countries.
Competitors may submit GAs, GTs, FAs, FTs, FLs, FPs, and DYK and ITN entries from/on developing countries to gain points and proceed to further rounds. Points are also awarded to those who review GAs, FAs and FLs.
Cameroon is listed as a developing country for the purposes of this contest, so articles related to it are eligible to be submitted for points. I encourage everyone here to sign up and compete with editors from around the world to create high-quality content!
Append your name to the DCWC signup page today!
Best wishes, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 11:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Would people be interested in joining a wikiproject on improving and creating articles about oral tradition? Wikipedia's coverage on this appears to be very poor Kowal2701 (talk) 19:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Women in Green's October 2024 edit-a-thon
edit
Hello WikiProject Cameroon:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 11:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Please translate this article into English. Bearian (talk) 02:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
The DCWC is back!
edit
WikiProject Cameroon, the Developing Countries WikiContest will be returning for a second year, and sign-ups are now open! The contest will run from 1 July to 30 September, and the objective remains the same: improve as many articles relating to developing countries as you can to help fight systemic bias on Wikipedia.
In other news, we have a new face on the coordinator team this year: last year's sixth-place finisher, Arconning (talk · contribs)! The coordinators would like to extend a sincere thanks to Ixtal (talk · contribs), who is leaving the team, without whom the contest would not exist. After feedback from contestants last year, the scoring rules are undergoing some modifications; the new rules and a summary of the changes made will be posted to the contest talk page shortly.
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page, use the {{@DCWC coordinators}} template, or contact one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove this talk page from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 12:15, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Use Cameroonian English
edit
Template:Use Cameroonian English has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pineapple Storage (talk) 11:05, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Cameroon War#Requested move 29 October 2025
edit
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Cameroon War#Requested move 29 October 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 15:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
Student project, or poorly-guided editathon?
editThere seems to have been a spate of edits to Cameroonian politicians by very new editors today, some adding chunks of copyright material, others adding exact translations of copyright material, all apparently ignorant of much of WP:MOS such as referring to people by their surname, re-using references, formatting of dates, etc. I wonder whether it's a student project, or an editathon? Or just a group of friends who've decided to upgrade articles on politicians?
Some of the text added is very unencyclopedic, presumably because it's been lifted wholesale from an external source: too many of the "references" don't actually lead to a text, just to the front page of the news medium concerned. Example:
- Ephraïm Inoni was married to madam Lydia Nalova Litumbe and they both were blessed with four children but this union didn't last and that led to madam Lydia Nalova relocating to the US with her children, leaving the frustrated Inoni to organize another signing ceremony added to Ephraim Inoni with a ref which gets us nowhere.
Two different editors added copyright text to Emilia Monjowa Lifaka, one of them incompetently duplicating the text they were adding.
Can anyone identify the source of this spate of misguided edits, and suggest what can be done to redirect these editors' enthusiasm into more constructive edits? PamD 21:06, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Idea labs section about using British English templates for ENGVAR in regards to Englishes of Commonwealth/Former colonies
editHello! I am aware Template:Use Cameroonian English was deleted.
There is now a broader discussion about the usage of British English templates for ENGVAR in regards to Englishes of Commonwealth/Former colonies at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(idea_lab)#Use_British_English_templates WhisperToMe (talk) 21:43, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

The article Nchum Bafut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article contains no substantial verified information that cannot be found in wikilinked articles; its sole reference does not even verify the claims previously made, nor does it seem to meet general notability criteria or even geographic feature notability criteria. Promotional language is also an issue.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. ContributeToTheWiki (talk • contribs) 15:21, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
