Wikipedia talk:Standard offer

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Ahri Boy in topic Suggestion: Remove the standard offer?

Is contributing to other WMF projects required for blocked but not banned users.

edit

In the variations section, it says banned users must make contributions to other WMF projects. It does not say blocked users so is contributing to other WMF projects required for blocked but not banned users. Zxcv6666 (talk) 21:38, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

How long exactly?

edit

Some users are blocked for 182 days when six months is selected by the admin and some users are blocked for 184 days when six months is selected by the admin. If the standard offer is six months, how many days is it exactly? 1.129.110.121 (talk) 00:52, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

181 days and 183 days are also options when six months is selected on MediaWiki block duration. Jumbe (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
It really does not matter. Remsense   19:46, 8 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion: Remove the standard offer?

edit

I'm one of the few who thinks it's unnecessary. I get it users may have to wait simply reflect on their actions, but I think this is too strict of a essay. Personally, my suggestion is to remove this, so users wouldn't have to wait 6 months. Or at the very least, you can simply decrease the wait time.

Support

edit

Oppose

edit

Neutral

edit

Possible punishment optimisation (nsw)

edit

If you get banned during march, it will go to April and July school holidays which is 4 weeks no Wikipedia, if you get banned during September, it will go to march with the October school holiday being 2 weeks and the long Christmas school holiday being 6 weeks. So I may suggest that the offer to decrease for the banned during march because sometimes, those students may vandalise during march to optimise their offer. 23.162.200.141 (talk) 22:25, 16 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Comment

edit

Is there a standard offer for temporary accounts? ~2025-32152-70 (talk) 03:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)Reply