Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Economics
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Economics and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
| Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| WikiProject Economics was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 19 December 2011. |
Requested move at Talk:Employment-to-population ratio#Requested move 25 October 2025
edit
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Employment-to-population ratio#Requested move 25 October 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 15:23, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for International Finance Corporation
editInternational Finance Corporation has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:35, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
New article: Alberto Forchielli
editHello, I've created a new article on Alberto Forchielli, a biography of a living person (BLP), translated from the current, accepted Italian Wikipedia page (it:Alberto Forchielli). This new version is based on current notability and sourcing, which resolves the concerns from the 2017 deletion. Feedback is welcome. Thanks! Digressivo (talk) 18:56, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Request for review: Project Business Management
editHello,
A new article titled Project Business Management has been drafted and seeks review from editors familiar with economic activity, GDP accounting, and project-based industries.
The topic addresses projects delivered under commercial contracts between legally independent organisations. Because these projects involve market transactions, they contribute directly to GDP, in contrast to purely internal organisational projects. The article summarises peer-reviewed research on commercial project delivery, inter-organisational coordination, governance structures, and contracting forms in economically significant sectors such as construction, engineering, energy, infrastructure, and defence.
Any feedback on structure, terminology, accuracy or economic framing would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you. Gonrubma (talk) 07:32, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Eurasian Land Bridge
editEurasian Land Bridge has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:35, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Francis Amasa Walker
editFrancis Amasa Walker has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:56, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Discussion about WikiProject banner templates
editFor WikiProjects that participate in rating articles, the banners for talk pages usually say something like:
- "This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale."
There is a proposal to change the default wording on the banners to say "priority" instead of "importance". This could affect the template for your group. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council#Proposal to update wording on WikiProject banners. Stefen 𝕋ower Huddle • Handiwerk 19:42, 6 December 2025 (UTC) (on behalf of the WikiProject Council)
English variety discussed at Talk:AI bubble
editYour input at the following link is welcome: Talk:AI bubble#Which English variety? George Ho (talk) 23:43, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Requested move to uppercase War on Poverty at Talk:War on poverty#Requested move 19 January 2026
editThis RM may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:00, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:War on poverty#Requested move 19 January 2026
edit
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:War on poverty#Requested move 19 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 03:03, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Government debt as a percentage of GDP
editI've noticed that it's common on many articles to express a country's debt as a percentage of its GDP. For example, in National debt of the United States, "debt held by the public was estimated at 96.19% of GDP.
" This can be misleading, as percents are usually used for fractions where 100% is the maximum or has special significance. Since GDP is an annual quantity, the debt-to-GDP ratio is actually a duration, not a fraction. So it seems to me that it would be better to say "0.9619 years of GDP
" or "0.9619 times GDP
". What would you all think about a project-wide conversion from percentage notation to one of those?
I know the percentage notation is common in economic literature, but since Wikipedia is aimed at a general audience, I think it would be valuable to adjust how we write this number to help clarify its meaning to the noneconomist. And here's at least one source that calls out the problem with the percentage notation: Sheard, Pault. "Beware The Government Debt-To_GDP Ratio". NDTV Profit. Retrieved 2026-02-11. Justin Kunimune (talk) 13:09, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Global Connectivity Index#Requested move 29 January 2026
edit
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Global Connectivity Index#Requested move 29 January 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 10:23, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
Please add reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 01:35, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
- Which raises the obvious question: notability? (per Wikipedia:Notability (academics). 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Value of life § Requested move 12 February 2026
edit
An editor has requested that Value of life be moved to Value of a statistical life, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. 9ninety (talk) 13:42, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
China superpower status
editShould Wikipedia present China as a superpower since the 2020s or should we present an academic debate? See Talk:Superpower#China superpower status Moxy🍁 03:45, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
COI edit request relevant to this project: Luc Laeven
editJust notifying members of this project that there is a Conflict of Interest edit request relevant to this WikiProject at the Luc Laeven article. DrThneed (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Capitalist mode of production (Marxist theory)#Requested move 29 March 2026
edit
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Capitalist mode of production (Marxist theory)#Requested move 29 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 08:14, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Daron Acemoglu
editDaron Acemoglu has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:51, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
edit
Hello, |
What a mess. This is a poorly sourced BLP and autobiographical piece. It's been proposed for deletion, and vandalized repeatedly by irate students, so AfD is the only way out. Bearian (talk) 13:12, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive
edit| Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive | |
| June 2026 Backlog Drive:
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can sign up here. | |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive. | |

