Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/Bustle
 | This page is a test version of a potential new layout for the Perennial sources project. It is a demo and not part of the live listings. See Talk. |
 | This source in a nutshell: There is  no consensus on the reliability of Bustle. See § Summary. |
| type | website |
|---|---|
| shortcut | WP:BUSTLE |
| status | no consensus |
| deprecated | no |
| blacklisted | no |
| recency | 2019 |
| Domain bustle.com | |
| In source code Spamcheck tool | |
Bustle is a source that has been repeatedly discussed at Bustle. This page collects and links information about previous discussions and current consensus, and summarizes it here for convenience.
Summary
editThere is consensus that the reliability of Bustle is unclear and that its reliability should be decided on an instance-by-instance basis. Editors noted that it has an editorial policy and that it will issue retractions. Editors also noted previous issues it had around reliability and that its content is written by freelance writers – though there is no consensus on whether this model affects their reliability.
Excerpt
editDiscussions
editOriginal table row for comparison
edit| Source | Status (legend) |
Discussions | Use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| List | Last | Summary | |||
| Bustle WP:BUSTLE 📌 |
|
 2019 |
2019 |
There is consensus that the reliability of Bustle is unclear and that its reliability should be decided on an instance-by-instance basis. Editors noted that it has an editorial policy and that it will issue retractions. Editors also noted previous issues it had around reliability and that its content is written by freelance writers – though there is no consensus on whether this model affects their reliability. | 1  
|