Wikipedia:Peer review/Talonflame/archive1

Talonflame

I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to bring this to Featured article status in the near future if possible.

Thanks, Cukie Gherkin (talk) 00:38, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Olliefant

• The images need alt text

  Added alt text

• In the ref titles "GO" should be "Go" per MOS:ALLCAPS

  Fixed

• Ref 6 should link "Bleeding Cool"

  Fixed

• Ref 20 should be marked as being in French

  Added

• Ref 29 is appearing as dead despite the original being live

  I'm not sure how to fix that

• Ref 27 is missing the website

  What do you mean? the |work is listed as Behind the Voice Actors, and it links to the website

• "In a 2020 official poll" in what medium?

  Clarified

• "Ash would later send Talonflame to live with Professor Oak" and "It was featured in his final team in a championship tournament, the Kalos Lumiose Conference" these two are in the wrong order

  Fixed

• Link "non-playable character" on first mention

  Done

That's what I found Olliefant (she/her) 02:35, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

@Olliefant: Responded to your comments - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:01, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

I meant ref 37, it was a typo Olliefant (she/her) 22:28, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Oh, gotcha - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Could you put citation at the photo's caption at concept and design section? 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 19:18, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Did - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 01:33, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Article is written well and looks like all sources are reliable. You can italicize game titles per MOS:TITLECAPS. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 02:35, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

FAC PR sidebar

@Cukie Gherkin: I have added this article to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar. Please consider reviewing other articles listed there. Z1720 (talk) 02:22, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

ZooBlazer

• "if Talonflame's attack is Flying-type" --> It was just mentioned by name in the previous sentence, so maybe change to "if its"
• "which Flying-type moves to take priority over other Pokémon's move" --> "which allows..." or something like that
• "it was initially viewed as a useless Pokémon, which changed once people understood" --> I think "which" technically refers to Talonflame itself. Change it to something like "a perception which changed..." or "a view which changed..." to clarify

Just a few minor things. Good job with the article. -- ZooBlazer 07:23, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

This has been inactive for a couple of weeks, so I'm going to close it. RoySmith (talk) 20:04, 6 April 2026 (UTC)