| Toolbox |
|---|
I've made substantial improvements and cleaned up the article and would like another set of eyes to go over it for a sanity check. Hoping to get the article to Good or FA status eventually.
Thanks, DiamondIIIXX (talk) 22:14, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hi! I’ll be doing a thorough review of the article (Most likely a source/citation spot check) when I have the time, but for now I moved one of the images to the right, because you know, sandwiched text. I’m also looking to submit an article for peer review soon, so I’d familiarise myself by helping others first. Cheers :) Hason-LEK-SIN ● Let’s chat! ● My contribs 14:09, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
Do you have a better source for Pyrex#cite ref-12? Yahoo Finance is not the best source…- I realised that the article came from Bloomberg. See if you can find the original article from themselves, though you can leave the existing Yahoo article there since Bloomberg is notorious for paywalling every article (unless you can find an un-paywalled archive link).
- Remember, Yahoo is a news aggregator, not a news “publisher” themselves. Hason-LEK-SIN ● Let’s chat! ● My contribs 13:47, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
- In Pyrex#Composition, with
“The composition of both Corning 7740 and Schott 8330 is given as …”, could you make sure that it has a inline citation in it? I (want to) believe this info is found in other sources, but it’s better to play it safe and cite it inline by reusing refs. - In Pyrex#Visual differences, with
“Corning designer Herb Dann noted in a 2014 interview”…, could you paraphrase the interview in your own words, unless you are sure the text is available (from the source) under CC-BY-SA or another compatible license? - Also, given the length of the article, I think the lead could do with one additional paragraph for the last few sections in the page. Hason-LEK-SIN ● Let’s chat! ● My contribs 14:05, 15 June 2026 (UTC)