| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I am wondering how I can improve it and maybe submit it for GAN.
Thanks, AllegedlyAPhotographer (talk) 17:43, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
Comments by AdaCiccone
edit- The most visible thing from my eyes is the History section. It could be better if you reorganise it into a proper prose instead of just several short sentences. Also, the lead section doesn't seem to quite capture the whole article. But that should be the last thing you work on, because the most ideal way to build the best lead is to make sure the entire body is finished first.
- Also, some sections are glaringly shorter than the others. I'm not saying that every section has to be of similar length but at least it has to have a similar weight. AdaCiccone (talk) 09:52, 20 April 2026 (UTC)