Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/United Airlines Flight 232/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Two weeks with no efforts made to address the issues with this article. Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:15, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
Per my comment on the talk page:
Aviationwikiflight (talk) 07:43, 14 March 2026 (UTC)For this article to retain its good article status, the following need to be addressed in accordance with the good article criteria:
- United Airlines Flight 232 § Accident:
- In United Airlines Flight 232 § Attempts to control the plane:
- Uncited from "Fitch" to "adjustments";
- In United Airlines Flight 232 § Crash landing:
- Two unsourced passages ("anticipating...down"; "The reports...over") ;
- In United Airlines Flight 232 § Injuries and deaths:
- One unsourced passage ("Many...structure");
- United Airlines Flight 232 § Investigation:
- Before the subsections:
- One unsourced passage ("The rest...nearby");
- United Airlines Flight 232 § Failed component:
- One unsourced passage tagged with an
[original research?]tag ("If the...disk");- United Airlines Flight 232 § Influence on the industry:
- Before the subsections:
- Two unsourced passages ("At the...1989"; "The last...2022");
- First passage now sourced, and half of second passage. Bob1960evens (talk) 00:26, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
- United Airlines Flight 232 § Aircraft designs:
- Unsourced from "Although" to "United 232";
- United Airlines Flight 232 § Restraints for children:
- Orange
{{update section|date=February 2026}}tag;- United Airlines Flight 232 § Notable people onboard:
- Numerous unsourced lines;
- Tagged with a
{{More citations needed section|date=July 2025}}tag;- Two
{{Unreliable source}}tags (see WP:IMBD);
- Completely WP:OR as nearly none of the cited mention these occurrences in the context of UA232.
- Note d is unsourced.
- The addition of significant chunks of unsourced text to good articles which were previously fully sourced seems to be a perenial problem. Presumably one option would be to invoke the "unsourced information may be removed without warning" clause which seems to be Wikipedia policy. Bob1960evens (talk) 00:31, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.