Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Syntactic Structures/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. Nominator's concerns addressed. TompaDompa (talk) 17:27, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Lots of uncited statements. It also has an "unbalanced POV" orange banner from July 2023. Z1720 (talk) 20:54, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Keep: I've removed the POV section, it's not just POV but synthesis. There's very little wrong with the rest of the text; I've removed a couple of (very small) uncited bits which were actually implicit in the cited text. The only other "uncited" material is essentially "plot", i.e. a description of the book's contents. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:21, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Chiswick Chap: I addeed some citation needed templates: I think these concern definitive statements outside of MOS:PLOT that will need to be verified. I think those will be my only concerns. Z1720 (talk) 00:34, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- Z1720: Many thanks; all done to date. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:38, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Chiswick Chap: I addeed some citation needed templates: I think these concern definitive statements outside of MOS:PLOT that will need to be verified. I think those will be my only concerns. Z1720 (talk) 00:34, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- Keep. Concerns resolved. Z1720 (talk) 14:46, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.