Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Hilaria Baldwin/2

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:34, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hilaria is featured in The Baldwins, but this article only has one line about it in the lead. Information about her involvement with the show should be added to the Career section. When looking for sources, I found an event in 2021 where Hilaria was interupted by/interupted her husband at a red carpet event. Many pop culture news outlets covered the event, but this article does not have information about it. I suggest that this be mentioned in the article. There doesn't seem to be much post-2019 career information. Besides The Baldwins mentioned above, is there other information to add here? Some unreliable sources are used in the article like Meaww, Hola! and New York Post. These should be replaced by reliable source. The lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article. Z1720 (talk) 05:05, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

an event in 2021 where Hilaria was interupted by/interupted her husband at a red carpet event. Seems like that event would fall under WP:NOTNEWS/WP:NOTDIARY. Some1 (talk) 02:00, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Some1: When I did a search for sources, this event was mentioned by several sources: some included critical commentary as a possible example (or how it should not be an example) of Mansplaining/manturupting (sources: , , .) I think the extensive coverage of the event means this should be mentioned in the article.
Also worth noting that Baldwin is a contestant on the upcoming season of Dancing with the Stars so information about that will also need to be added to the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:08, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Toronto Sun (your first link) is a tabloid newspaper, and the other two sources don't constitute "extensive coverage". I agree with you, though, that her being a contestant on the upcoming season of DWTS should be mentioned in the article and am actually surprised that it hasn't been added yet (I had actually came to this article because of the DWTS cast reveal!). I'll get the DWTS stuff added to the article. Some1 (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Some1: Are you willing to expand the lead so it covers all major aspects of the article? Z1720 (talk) 00:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry Z1720, but I'm not really interested in editing this article. As mentioned earlier, I had only visited the Baldwin article because of the DWTS 34 cast reveal. I had also overlooked that this discussion was part of a GA reassessment when I initially commented (through the Baldwin talk page), so this is my last comment here--good luck with the GA reassessment! :) Some1 (talk) 00:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.