Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/High Desert (Oregon)/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:43, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Uncited statements in the "Climate" and "Ecology" sections. Z1720 (talk) 15:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Jsayre64: Putting this on your radar, just in case! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't usually participate in the GA process, so this might be out of place. I think it would be helpful if the short footnotes like "Engeman, p. 61" were linked using standard {{sfn}} or similar templates. Those templates provide linking to the full source information below and check to ensure that the targeted reference actually exists. I'll be happy to do the work if there is consensus for it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 11:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'm fine to change the citations to the sfn template. Z1720 (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Jonesey95: I see that there are still some uncited statements. Are you or any other editor interested in resolving these? Of course, there's no obligation to do so. I am also happy to add citation needed templates if pinged. Z1720 (talk) 15:09, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- I have tidied the citations using {{harvnb}}, but I am not willing to do further research into the sources. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:07, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.