Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Flo Milli discography/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC) .[reply]

Flo Milli discography

Nominator(s): Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 07:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have been working on this article, I had previously FLC'd it but withdrew as I had gotten too busy with real life stuff but at the spur of the moment I am now reopening it. I've added all sourcing from my previous source review and fixed some other sourcing issues. For whoever does the source review, ~~I am waiting on a source for "Clap Sum" to be approved as of 1/30/2025~~ It’s been dealt with. Thanks, Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 07:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sgubaldo

Surprised to see this has no comments after nearly a month. Putting myself down, ping me if I haven't said anything by Wednesday. Sgubaldo (talk) 18:33, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sgubaldo: Hey, it's now Thursday. Do you have your review yet? Thanks, Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 07:08, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sgubaldo: Following up, you have anything? Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 04:10, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"released 2 studio albums, 1 mixtape, 57 singles (including 26 as a featured artist), and 40 music videos (including 14 as a featured artist)." ===> per MOS:NUMERAL, Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words
"After the release of the mixtape, she started.." ==> either "After the release of her mixtape, Milli started" or "After the mixtape's release, Milli started"
"In late 2023, she released "Never Lose Me" as the lead single for Fine Ho, Stay, reaching number 15 on the Billboard Hot 100 and has since been..." ==> "In late 2023, she released "Never Lose Me" as the lead single for Fine Ho, Stay, which reached number 15 on the Billboard Hot 100 and has since..."
"In 2021, "In the Party" and "Beef FloMix" were certified gold..." ==> article body says "In the Party" is platinum; mention that later in the lead?
I don't think Ref. 90 needs to have GRM Daily as author
In general, the lead feels a bit short. I suppose I don't have specific pointers on what could get expanded, and other reviewers might disagree.

Sorry for taking so long, some comments above. Sgubaldo (talk) 10:56, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sgubaldo: Been busy all week but I have done these small fixes, I did reword a bit of the end of paragraph 2 to also "In the Party" being certified platinum. Thanks, Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 21:20, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, even though I still feel the lead needs expansion. Sgubaldo (talk) 13:56, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sgubaldo: There really isn't much to expand it for. It mentions all her major accomplishments, her albums, her mixtape, all of her charting and accredited songs, and small important details. She also hasn't been making music for a while (6 years now) unlike a lot of more popular artists. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 05:03, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Source and image review from TheDoctorWho

The following comments are based off of this revision:

List only has one image that was originally uploaded to YouTube under a CC license.
Image has caption and alt text
Ref 3: Missing a listed author
Ref 4: Missing an access date
Ref 7: Missing an access date
Ref 12: Doesn't appear to be loading any content for me? Do you know if this is just a temporary error for me or potentially something browser based?
Ref 16: Not a requirement (just a suggestion); add the text "Attributed to multiple sources:" above the first bullet point.
Ref 25: Missing an access date
Ref 26: Missing an access date
Ref 28: Missing an access date
Ref 29: Missing an access date
Ref 47: Missing an access date
Ref 54: Missing an access date
Ref 61: Missing an access date
Ref 63: Missing an access date
Ref 67: Missing an access date
Ref 69: Missing an access date
Ref 70: Missing an access date
Ref 74: Revolt TV --> Revolt; for consistency
Ref 78: Missing an access date
Ref 88: Missing an access date
Ref 90: Remove "Peaks on the NZ Hot Singles Chart:" as there's only one reference there
Ref 91: Missing an access date
Ref 92: Missing an access date
Ref 94: Missing an access date
Ref 119: Missing an access date
Ref 120: Missing an access date; link Hypebeast
Ref 122: Missing an access date
Roughly a third of the references are missing archives
References switch back and forth between using title and sentence case; this should be consistent in one format or the other. I suggest running this script to help clean that up.
There are also some MOS:CQ issues. A script also exists for this.
As well as a few incorrectly formatted dates. (Another script).
Spot-checked references 2, 6, 11, 18, 22, 28, 36, 40, 47, 51, 54, 65, 71, 77, 83, 89, 93, 98, 105, 112, 114, 119, 123, 128, 131
- Ref 6 is a dead link
- Ref 11 needs url-access=subscription
- Ref 98 doesn't confirm Jetphynx as director
- Ref 114 doesn't confirm Rich Boy as director, just an appearance
- Ref 123 doesn't confirm Stroup as director
- Ref 131 doesn't confirm Welch as director
Other comments:
- Ho, Why Is You Here? is completely unsourced in terms of a release date, formats, and record label
- "Never Lose Me" in the singles table is unsourced
- "Director(s)" in the Music Videos - As Lead Artist section should be changed to just "Director" as there aren't any cases with more than one director

TheDoctorWho (talk) 22:32, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheDoctorWho: There is genuinely no way to accurately put down an access date unless I put down the access date on the day that I am writing this, is that what you want to do? Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 23:15, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@TheDoctorWho: Everything should be fixed except title cases, the title case converter for whatever reason doesn't work for me (like a majority of editors). Ref 6 is not a dead link, it works for me. Added secondary sources for the rest of spot checks. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 01:22, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strange, perhaps 6 was just down at the time I checked it. Ran the title case script for you. Source and image reviews pass. TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

This review is based on this version of the article.

Ref 4 – Add author
Ref 34 – Can you find a different source to replace this permadead link that doesn't have an available archive?
Refs 30 and 44 – Is there a reason these references are formatted differently than the other Apple Music ones, in that, they don't have "(audio)" as part of the reference?
Ref 44 – Remove "on Apple Music" from the title
Ref 47 – Remove "BrooklynVegan Staff" as the author, it's presumed if one is not specified that the website staff is the author
Ref 63 – Pipe the website to just be "Paper", and make the target Paper (magazine)
Ref 91 – Wikilink Recorded Music NZ
Ref 119 – Remove "Music Staff" as the author

That's what I've got. Please ping me when the above has been addressed. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:30, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh:, all done. replaced ref 34 idolater with a new source. ref 30 and 44 were cite webs, not cite av media so switched them. thanks! Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 16:54, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:39, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. --Pres N 15:02, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.