Some analysis conducted on February 12th, 2021 using the search .
- I would consider this a successful edit request. Although the edit request is gigantic, ERW helped the user delineate their points
- Fail. Incorrect use of template.
- A successful example. Helps user explain their request
- Mixed results. The editor mistakenly put the request on their user talk page, but at least they provided an explanation using that field of the wizard
- Request is vague, but at least they provide explanations
- Did not use suggested fields
- Did not use suggested fields, but to their credit, the request was pretty trivial
- Successful edit request
- Successful edit request (I also think this shows errors in the reviewing process)
- Not using suggested fields but the request itself looks to be solid
- Successful edit request (was suggesting promotional change, but at least it was formatted and explained adequately)
- Successful use of form
- Successful in use of form
- Successful use of form
- Erroneously requested a page move
- Failed to use suggested fields
- Actually implemented. Successful use of template.
- Vague request, but correct use of template
- Way too promotional, but at least they added citations
- Erronously requesting page move
- Basically requesting removal of advert-esque sections. Was accepted, but could have easily been denied
- Incorrect use of template
- Incorrect use of template
- Correct use of template.
- Incorrect use of template. Way too vague.
- Kind of ok request even though the template wasn't followed exactly.
- Successful use of template, incorrect use of request in general
- Successful edit request. Implemented
- Successful use of template.