Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MilHistBot 10
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard. The result of the discussion was
Approved.
New to bots on Wikipedia? Read these primers!
- Approval process – How this discussion works
- Overview/Policy – What bots are/What they can (or can't) do
- Dictionary – Explains bot-related jargon
Operator: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 01:29, Tuesday, February 10, 2026 (UTC)
Function overview: Maintain the participants list of a MilHist task force (e.g. Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Military aviation task force).
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Source code available: https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/toolforge-repos/milhistbot-membership
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators#Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Military aviation task force
Edit period(s): monthly
Estimated number of pages affected: 57
Namespace(s): Wikipedia
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: Go through the membership of a MilHist task force (e.g. Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Military aviation task force) and comment out members inactive for more than 365 days. Uncomment members who were inactive but have now resumed activity.
Discussion
edit- Which are the 20 pages that this affects? – SD0001 (talk) 09:46, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- The pages in Category:WikiProject Military history task forces. Actually, there are 57 pages. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:55, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Approved for trial (2 weeks). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. – SD0001 (talk) 03:57, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- African military history task force
- American Revolutionary War task force
- Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
- Balkan military history task force
- Baltic states military history task force
- British military history task force
- Canadian military history task force
- Chinese military history task force
- Cold War task force
- Dutch military history task force
- Early Modern warfare task force
- Early Muslim military history task force
- Fortifications task force
- French military history task force
- German military history task force
- Intelligence task force
- Italian military history task force
- Japanese military history task force
- Maritime warfare task force
- Medieval warfare task force
- Middle Eastern military history task force
- Military aviation task force
- Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
- Military land vehicles task force
- Military logistics and medicine task force
- Military memorials and cemeteries task force
- Military science, technology, and theory task force
- Napoleonic era task force
- National militaries task force
- Nordic military history task force
- Post-Cold War task force
- Polish military history task force
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
- South American military history task force
- South Asian military history task force
- Southeast Asian military history task force
- Spanish military history task force
- United States military history task force
- Wars of the Three Kingdoms task force
- Weaponry task force
- World War I task force
- World War II task force
- Trial complete.
* The regular monthly run will not do nearly this much work. There was a backlog that the bot run was written to address. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:15, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hawkeye7: Why is the bot adding duplicate comment tags here? – DreamRimmer ■ 16:51, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- Two {{user}} templates on the one line. Some special code will be required to deal with this unusual situation. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:40, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hawkeye7: Why is the bot adding duplicate comment tags here? – DreamRimmer ■ 16:51, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Made the correction and run off another run. Due to the last one, this is a more typical run:
- Hawkeye7 (discuss)
Approved. – DreamRimmer ■ 13:35, 18 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard.