February 2025

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm Z. Patterson. I noticed that you recently removed content from Morris Edward Opler without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Z. Patterson (talk) 05:34, 13 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Economy of Madagascar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 13:25, 20 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Downtown Dallas, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:13, 20 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:X67098277, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=X67098277|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. You still have not responded to this request from User: Liz. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:15, 20 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

Information icon Hello, X67098277. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 06:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

edit
Teahouse logo
Hello! X67098277, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 06:19, 13 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jimmy Tandel (February 13)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1AmNobody24 was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Nobody (talk) 07:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft talk:Jimmy Tandel

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft talk:Jimmy Tandel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Ratnahastin (talk) 10:34, 13 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Large sections of bullet points/timelines

edit

Hi X67098277, please do not add large bullet point sections to the start of each article. The standard article has a text summary (called a lead), about four paragraphs of prose. CMD (talk) 13:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Could you also clarify where you find your sources? I tried to find the ones you added to Nubian languages and couldn't verify their existence. CMD (talk) 13:43, 20 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Question...

edit

I noticed you contacted User:Isochrone to ask this question:

  • "I only like to do red missions topic can it's alright?"

With the backdrop being that every one of your edits has been reverted by multiple editors, would it be fair to suggest you are using AI or some cut-and-paste method to make your copious edits? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:24, 20 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

i just used it for some evidence or information X67098277 (talk) 08:28, 22 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
English is evidently not a language you are competent with. Please stop adding cut-and-paste, or AI generated text. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:11, 22 February 2025 (UTC)Reply