Your submission at Articles for creation: Romain CAYLA (September 27)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hoary were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
None of the exhibitions is sourced. We read that he's "a French visual artist active in narrative configuration, recognized for his artistic interventions on canvas and in public space". Please reexpress this kind of prose for effective communication to a reader who doesn't happen to have an MFA.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 07:45, 27 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Will229! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 07:45, 27 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

October 2025

edit

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Porto-Novo, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ultraodan (talk) 09:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Will229. Thank you for your work on Europeans Without Borders. Another editor, 11WB, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

It would be good if the sections could be expanded.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11WB}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 21:30, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

@11WB: Thank you for your review and for the suggestion. I agree that several sections could be expanded. The current version was intended as a well-sourced initial overview, and I plan to develop it further with additional reliably sourced material. Thank you for the constructive feedback. Will229 (talk) 08:49, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Romain CAYLA

edit

Information icon Hello, Will229. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Romain CAYLA, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Romain CAYLA

edit

Hello, Will229. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Romain CAYLA".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:26, 1 April 2026 (UTC)Reply