WhiteKettle
Welcome!
editHello, Gokulbutail, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the articles you created, such as Draft:Aditya SK, may not meet Wikipedia's content policies. In short, to be included on Wikipedia, the topic of an article must be notable and have been covered by published reliable and independent sources. Articles must be written in a neutral manner and may not contain AI generated material.
Please read Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article for review. Note that articles are reviewed by volunteers and that it can take some time. If you'd like someone else to create an article, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or the page on contributing to Wikipedia. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – for contributing to other articles. Writing a new article is tough, so getting experience elsewhere is useful.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! EaglesFan37 (talk) 01:29, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Aditya SK
edit
Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Aditya SK, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EaglesFan37 (talk) 01:29, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
@Gokulbutail - You have created a few draft pages — Draft:Soniya B Bansal and Draft:Aditya SK — that appear to be test pages, as they only have a the name of the person. These are being as speedy deleted as test pages. — ERcheck (talk) 04:08, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
May 2026
edit
Hello WhiteKettle. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WhiteKettle. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WhiteKettle|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:16, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- I am not receiving and have never received any compensation for my edits on Wikipedia. If I were editing with a conflict of interest or promotional intent i would likely be repeatedly editing the same page or closely related topics. My contributions have been across different subjects, including biographies, films, and draft improvements. I have no financial professional, or personal affiliation with the subjects I edit. If any specific edit is concerning I am happy to discuss it and make corrections where needed. WhiteKettle (talk) 09:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Cadddr. A comment that you recently posted seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Editors should not use LLMs to write comments generatively. Communication is at the root of Wikipedia's decision-making process, and it is presumed that editors possess the ability to come up with their own ideas. Your comment may have been collapsed per the relevant guideline. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cadddr (talk) 08:48, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- I am familiar with the LLM guideline and the comment was written in my own words. The reason it may appear more polished is that I use a keyboard application with grammar and writing-assistance features. It automatically corrects grammar.. punctuation.. capitalization and sometimes suggests alternative wording..As far as I understand, the guideline restricts using LLMs to generate the content of comments. It does not prohibit the use of grammar- or spell-checking tools that assist with writing. If there is a specific part of my comment that raised concern please let me know and I would be happy to clarify(: WhiteKettle (talk) 10:32, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if I was incorrect in thinking you were using an LLM. If you don't mind me asking, what is the name of this application you're using? Cadddr (talk) 12:39, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- The application I use is Microsoft SwiftKey it is primarily a keyboard app that provides autocorrect spelling correction-punctuation-assistance-capitalization fixes and predictive text suggestions while typing. I write my comments myself but the keyboard may occasionally suggest alternative wording or help improve grammar and readability. I do not use it to generate the substance or arguments of my comments it only assists with writing mechanics in the same way that i see some editors to use spell-checkers or grammar-checking tools.. WhiteKettle (talk) 16:34, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you. Cadddr (talk) 16:43, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- The application I use is Microsoft SwiftKey it is primarily a keyboard app that provides autocorrect spelling correction-punctuation-assistance-capitalization fixes and predictive text suggestions while typing. I write my comments myself but the keyboard may occasionally suggest alternative wording or help improve grammar and readability. I do not use it to generate the substance or arguments of my comments it only assists with writing mechanics in the same way that i see some editors to use spell-checkers or grammar-checking tools.. WhiteKettle (talk) 16:34, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if I was incorrect in thinking you were using an LLM. If you don't mind me asking, what is the name of this application you're using? Cadddr (talk) 12:39, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
edit![]() |
Hello WhiteKettle! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
