Your submission at Articles for creation: Colston Creek (March 1)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:
"Colston Creek" is not mentioned in the footnoted article, and on neither Google nor gBooks am I finding any mention of such in that region.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:40, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


Teahouse logo
Hello, WestVirginiaMountineer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:40, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Colston Creek (April 10)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You resubmitted this without making any changes. That's not useful. You'll need to find some good sources (see WP:RS) for this to be accepted.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 20:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thanks for making the WV pages MUCH better!!! WestVirginiaIsCool (talk) 02:06, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply