Welcome!

edit

Hi WaddleDean! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 06:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dream Widow (April 1)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 06:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, WaddleDean! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 06:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Dream Widow

edit

Information icon Hello, WaddleDean. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dream Widow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Dream Widow

edit

Hello, WaddleDean. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dream Widow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm FlightTime. Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Skid Row (American band) even if you provide a/some source(s), you'll still need to start a discussion on the article talk page to allow editors who regular watch that page a chance to discuss the reliability of the source(s) you provided. One reason is, genre sources can easily be considered an opinion and not fact. Genre's are a touchy subject here on Wikipedia and without discussion/consensus, regardless of your source(s), your addition or removal will most likely be reverted. Your edit has been reverted and archived in the page history for now.

Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive.

Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florence Road (March 17)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:29, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florence Road (April 27)

edit
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Nothing suggests they can meet the notability criteria previously outlined.
S0091 (talk) 22:02, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Florence Road has a new comment

edit
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Florence Road. Thanks! Joãohola 06:51, 25 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florence Road has been accepted

edit
Florence Road, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 23:57, 26 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

July 2025

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm S0091. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. S0091 (talk) 14:18, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

On Song Articles

edit

Hello there. I wanted to just address the slew of song articles you recently created:

As far as I can tell, all of these songs are sourced entirely to articles about the album as a whole. This means that these songs lack significant coverage, and thus are not notable enough to warrant standalone pages. Instead, it would be more fit to discuss each of these songs on the album pages as a whole, which could allow for a richer conversation about the song and its surrounding context. In short, please consider adding some reliable sources into each of these articles, which have these songs as their subjects (i.e. talk extensively about them beyond a brief mention in an album review). If you are unable to find those sources, then it is highly unlikely that these songs should have a standalone article. Leafy46 (talk) 19:48, 21 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Due to a week having passed without any of these concerns being addressed, I have decided to blank-and-redirect the Radiohead songs back to their parent album articles, and have addressed the others. If you disagree with any of these redirects, feel free to revert the edits with explanation and proof of why they have enough significant coverage to warrant a standalone page. Leafy46 (talk) 17:30, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply