Vivowrites

Lorinne Vozoff page corrections

Appreciate you refining the article and catching that IMDb link. ~~~~ Fixthisbs (talk) 04:24, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Drafts

Please note that per WP:DRAFTNOCAT, drafts such as Draft:Nora Benavidez are not allowed to be filed in categories as if they were already finished articles. The page must stay out of any categories as long as it's in draft, and can be added to categories only if and when it gets accepted and moved into mainspace by an AFC reviewer — so long as it remains in draft, it is only permitted to have disabled category links on it, meaning they're present as a text link to the category without filing the page in the category. As I've already had to disable categories on the page twice, please don't reenable them, or add more enabled categories, while the page remains in draft. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 11:40, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much. I failed to see your note until just now. I'll be careful of this in any future article. Vivowrites (talk) 20:03, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks again, Bearcat. I’ve revised the draft so the categories are now disabled rather than removed, in accordance with WP:DRAFTNOCAT. They no longer place the draft in live categories and will be re-enabled once the page moves to mainspace. Again, I appreciate the heads up. Sorry you had to disable categories twice on the page. I didn't understand, but now I think I've got it right. Vivowrites (talk) 20:26, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nora Benavidez (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nora Benavidez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:29, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Vivowrites! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:29, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nora Benavidez (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NJOURNALIST.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nora Benavidez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:16, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Nora Benavidez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nora Benavidez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nora Benavidez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 00:43, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Warning

Hello, I'm Katzrockso. An edit that you recently made to Nora Benavidez seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katzrockso (talk) 02:26, 29 November 2025 (UTC)