User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Archives/June 2024

Skip to top
Skip to bottom


Discussion

edit

I have begun a discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket about the name of the T20 WC. Feel free to participate! Pharaoh496 (talk) 09:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the notice! Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 10:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Template:2024 ICC Men's T20 World Cup Group A

edit

We should to restore the earlier format atleast until the end of the tournament, what was the reason for removal of runs scored, overs bowled and such attributes from the template? Cric editor (talk) 04:24, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

In the earlier format. the NRR is calculated each time when loading the page, which takes up memory to execute; specially for pages like 2024 T20WC which has 6 points tables. But, we could keep the earlier format until the end of the Group stage. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 04:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes I guess we can settle with that till group stage, like it's done for all other tournaments. Cric editor (talk) 04:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also in the 2024 ICC Men's T20 World Cup qualification, There are 5 "Final standings (Sub-regional qualifier)" and 5 "Final standings (Regional final)"; It's better to avoid similar headings in a same page as it would result in the anchors being misdirected. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 04:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also, we don't need the final standings here; only points table is enough. ( see 2023 Cricket World Cup qualification) Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 05:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-23

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Change back to Detailed Result

edit

Hello there! Can you kindly change it back to old result board in 2024 ICC Men's T20 World Cup that it written in details 2400:ADC5:164:3000:9496:392F:75CE:AD63 (talk) 19:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The detailed results are included in the Group articles, only a summary is kept at the main page.
Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 04:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-24

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 20:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect revert done by Vestrian24Bio

edit

@Vestrian24Bio : About your revert ---> "Reverting edit(s) by IndoPakAfgh (talk) to rev. 1229017290 by Pkr206: Non-constructive edit (UV 0.1.5)". on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3A2024_ICC_Men%27s_T20_World_Cup_Group_C&oldid=prev&diff=1229033107

How my edit was a "Non-constructive edit"?

as per /2024_ICC_Men%27s_T20_World_Cup#Super_8, Afghanistan has already qualified to Super 8, which means other three teams are eliminated.

Either you have been Non-constructive or Super 8 section is incorrect. IndoPakAfgh (talk) 14:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Q, E is placed only when the qualification isn't complete for the group with the table text saying "Advance to Super 8". But, now that the Qualification in Group C is over it's not needed anymore; instead the table text says: "Advanced to Super 8" stating that both  West Indies and  Afghanistan have qualified for Super 8 and there's no need for the Q, E text anymore. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 14:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yeah but Afghanistan is still listed as "Q", and the eliminated teams are listed as "E". Your revert makes it inconsistent @Vestrian24Bio.
As the group stages are still ongoing, we should stick to consistency between the groups, and use Q/E everywhere. It's confusing to use them for some groups and skip them for others.
Also, this should be discussed in the talk page not on user talk. Soni (talk) 16:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I agree this should be discussed in the talk page; I just continued what started by @IndoPakAfgh here. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 16:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Unfounded justification for reverting edit

edit

If you didn't like the edit, it doesn't mean it's not constructive. I just resized the poster image in ""Please Please Please"" which is unnecessarily large in the article. How can this be a non-constructive edit? Should have put "I prefer the large image" in the reason for reverting. Damitinha (talk) 07:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thumbnails aren't supposed to have a size limit per MOS, because thumb file display size is user preferred. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 07:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
See MOS:IMGSIZE Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 07:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
And why is doing something to improve the layout and visualization of the article a non-constructive edit? From what I saw here on your talk page you use the term "non-constructive editing" incorrectly Damitinha (talk) 07:14, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Read MOS:IMGSIZE Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 07:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I may have been hasty, but at least justify correctly when reverting an edit, simply using "non-constructive edit" does not justify or explain anything. Damitinha (talk) 07:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry about that; I usually leave a talk page message after reverting, missed this time. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 07:31, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-25

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 23:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Indian Premier League final preload

edit

Tech News: 2024-26

edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Songs

edit

What was the purpose of these articles: Samgrame (song) and Lokiverse (song). I have redirected them because the sourcing was very poor and the sourcing in the article did not mention it. Samgrame sounds cool wish there was a full version. DareshMohan (talk) 08:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
Hi Vestrian24Bio! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 08:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter

edit

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for 2024 ICC Men's T20 World Cup final

edit

On 30 June 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 ICC Men's T20 World Cup final, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 19:44, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply