December 2021

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to HMS Tiger (C20) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Smith & Wesson Model 10, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 23:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, List of People Who's Heads Just Did That

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of People Who's Heads Just Did That. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of assassinations. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of assassinations. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. WhoAteMyButter (📨talk📝contribs) 04:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

September 2022

edit

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of People Who's Heads Just Did That, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GedUK  08:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ᛒᛚᚮᚴᚴᚼᛆᛁ ᛭ 𝔅𝔩𝔬𝔠𝔨𝔥𝔞𝔧 06:14, 21 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

LANTIRN edits

edit

Hi. I noticed your edit remarks for the two edits you made today on the LANTIRN article, and it led me to wonder. In both remarks, you said you were deleting parts of the article because they weren’t true. After deleting, you did not discuss the lack of truth or provide sources for contending they weren’t true on the talk page.

I am convinced you intended the edits in good faith and there’s no conflict of interest. Can you at least provide sources on the talk page supporting your claims? That way others might save time not putting those comments back. — TadgStirkland401(TadgTalk-Email) 00:24, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

will do sorry thanks Vesole878 (talk) 06:34, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply