Veritanumeri
Welcome...
Hello, Veritanumeri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Tutorials and editing suggestions
- Help
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or .
If you have particular interests like Aviation, you may add these if there are relevant Wikipedia:Userboxes to your User page see Wikipedia:User pages. These are kind of like the clubs within Wikipedia. And having a User page helps the Wikipedia community to know your interests better as a wikipedian, like a personal profile page. You can check out mine as an example.
Again, welcome! Villkomoses (talk) 14:13, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
April 2026
edit
Hello, I'm ChildrenWillListen. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. Children Will Listen (đ talk, đ« contribs) 13:00, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I'm MrOllie. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that in one of your recent contributions to Generative engine optimization, you cited a link to a source that may not be reliable. Sources considered unreliable should generally not be used to support statements. Information from an unreliable source can be challenged by other editors and removed. Reliable sources are generally those with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. Self-published material, user-generated content, and certain other outlets such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites or publications with a poor reputation for fact-checking may not meet these standards. If you are unsure about which sources are appropriate, there is a list of sources that are considered generally reliable. Additionally, some WikiProjects have their own lists of sources that are considered reliable for that particular subtopic. If you are still unsure about a source's reliability, you can ask at the reliable sources noticeboard. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 13:01, 23 April 2026 (UTC)