VarastadDB

Welcome!

Hello, VarastadDB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited was Draft:Varastad DerBedrosian, which appears to be a draft of an article about yourself. Writing about yourself is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians.

As this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them. A page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Getting started
• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask at Teahouse, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Agent 007 (talk) 09:40, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Well here is the issue it’s creating and publishing a page associated with me with random information like about trains or the internet I don’t want to associated with that VarastadDB (talk) 09:41, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

A person must meet the notability criteria for people to be considered worthy of inclusion. To meet these criteria, a person must have already received significant coverage from multiple reliable and independent sources. Article content must consist of paraphrased summaries of previously published material from those sources.

That is why it is also an inherent conflict of interest to write about yourself. You are not an objective judge of your own notabilty; you will find it difficult to write from the required neutral point of view; and you cannot use any unpublished personal knowledge or experience. If and when you are notable enough, then someone else who has no connection to you will eventually write an article about you. I advise you to review the following links:

• Wikipedia:Autobiography
• Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not about YOU
• Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing

--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:48, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Varastad DerBedrosian (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Quinntropy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Varastad DerBedrosian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Quinn (talk) 10:03, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, VarastadDB! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! • Quinn (talk) 10:03, 28 February 2026 (UTC)