October 2025

edit
Information icon

Hello Val4Voys. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Val4Voys. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Val4Voys|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi 331dot,
Thank you for your message and for clarifying the policy. You are correct that I have a professional affiliation with Voys. I want to make sure I handle this properly — I’m new to Wikipedia and still learning the right processes.
Could you please confirm where exactly I should add the required disclosure? I understand it needs to go on my user page, but I’d appreciate a quick pointer or example to make sure I’m doing it correctly.
I haven’t made any further edits since receiving your note, and I’ll wait for your confirmation before proceeding.
Kind regards,
Val4Voys Val4Voys (talk) 16:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi 331dot,
I worked it out....I’ve now added the required disclosure on my user page in line with the Wikimedia Foundation’s Terms of Use.
I’ll make sure any future edits or suggestions are made via the article’s Talk page to ensure full transparency and neutrality.
Kind regards,
Val4Voys Val4Voys (talk) 16:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Voys (October 29)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ultraodan was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ultraodan (talk) 08:05, 29 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Val4Voys! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ultraodan (talk) 08:05, 29 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Voys (October 29)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 15:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

It appears you may have used a large language model (LLM), such as ChatGPT, in your edits. While LLMs are powerful, machine-generated text often contains serious flaws. They may introduce bias, errors, plagiarism, libel, or even hoaxes. Specifically asking an LLM to "write a Wikipedia article" can sometimes cause the output to be outright fabrication, complete with fictitious references. Editors must verify all LLM-generated text before using it in an article. Completely LLM-generated articles may be quickly deleted. If you are unsure about your wording, an alternative is to suggest it on the talk page for another volunteer to look at it. If you are creating a new article, you may use the Articles for Creation process to get feedback on your work.

As you get started editing Wikipedia, you may find the pages below to be helpful:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page, and someone will be along to answer it shortly. In your messages, please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. Happy editing! jlwoodwa (talk) 18:26, 29 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Voys

edit

Information icon Hello, Val4Voys. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Voys, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 2 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Voys

edit

Hello, Val4Voys. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Voys".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply