Uzunx44

Disruptive edits

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 11:21, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 11:22, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello Canterbury Tail,

Thank you for your message.

I would like to clarify that my edits were never made arbitrarily or with disruptive intent. On the contrary, I have consistently aimed to improve the article by basing my contributions on reliable and verifiable sources, fully aligned with Wikipedia's core principles of neutrality and verifiability.

I must also note that I am relatively new to the editing process and may have made some technical mistakes or failed to add references properly at first. However, this should not be interpreted as malicious editing or bad faith. My only motivation has been to enhance the quality and accuracy of the information provided to the public.

What concerns me deeply is that, despite my efforts to improve the content and support it with credible sources, my edits were dismissed without proper discussion or fair evaluation of the evidence provided. It is disheartening to see that decisions appear to be based on editor seniority rather than the quality of contributions. Seniority should not grant the right to unilaterally dictate content, especially when doing so disregards valid sources and inhibits collaborative editing — a principle that lies at the heart of Wikipedia.

Allowing this kind of dynamic, where established editors impose their will without fair consideration of newer contributors’ good-faith efforts, ultimately harms the integrity and inclusiveness of the Wikipedia community.

I respectfully request that my edits and the supporting references be evaluated on their merit, not on the editor's tenure. I am more than willing to engage in constructive dialogue on the article’s talk page and work toward consensus in line with Wikipedia’s collaborative spirit.

Thank you for your understanding. Uzunx44 (talk) 15:22, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Çukurova International Airport. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 01:55, 10 June 2025 (UTC)