Usualearly

Speedy deletion of Jonathan Glatzer

A tag has been placed on Jonathan Glatzer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —αlεx•mullεr 11:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Princess hilary duff.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Hilary duff planner fc.jpg. The copy called Image:Hilary duff planner fc.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 11:29, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Hilary-Duff.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hilary-Duff.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Princess Hilary Duff.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Princess Hilary Duff.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Suite Life on Deck. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 18:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to The Hunchback of Notre Dame III. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 18:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Suite Life on Deck, you will be blocked from editing. Deliberately fake information NrDg 19:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Invention of information, creating hoaxes. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. NrDg 19:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC)