UsamaSarwar

Your submission at Articles for creation: UsamaSarwar (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UsamaSarwar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, UsamaSarwar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UsamaSarwar (October 27)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Stop trying to use Wikipedia to promote yourself

KylieTastic (talk) 10:56, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Usama Sarwar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Usama Sarwar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 12:43, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 12:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

This biography of Usama Sarwar highlights his journey as a notable app developer, emphasising his contributions to the tech community and his impact on app development without straying into promotional territory. It focuses on his achievements and recognition in a way that remains informative and engaging. By adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines on verifiability and neutrality, the biography ensures that all claims are backed by reliable sources, making it a credible resource for readers interested in Usama's work. This approach not only presents Usama's professional story but also reflects the values of sharing knowledge responsibly, distinguishing it from any promotional content.

For more details on Wikipedia's content guidelines, you can explore the pages on verifiability, neutral point of view, and notability. UsamaSarwar (talk) 12:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Usama Sarwar (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Usama Sarwar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your review of my submission on Usama Sarwar. I understand the importance of providing reliable references to demonstrate notability. However, I would like to clarify that primary sources can often be the most authentic representation of an individual's achievements. While news media can be ambiguous at times, firsthand accounts and credible primary sources can offer a clear perspective on a person's contributions. I appreciate any guidance you may have on additional references or how to improve the submission to better align with Wikipedia’s standards. Thank you for your assistance. UsamaSarwar (talk) 12:54, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because your username is a clear violation of Wikipedia's username policy – it is obviously offensive, profane, violent, threatening, sexually explicit, disruptive, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} 331dot (talk) 13:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UsamaSarwar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

SoftwareEngineerPK (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand that my previous username and edits were seen as promotional and I apologize for this. I have read the Conflict of Interest and Neutral Point of View policies. I would like to change my username to "SoftwareEngineerPK" to comply with the username policy and I promise that, if unblocked, I will focus on improving articles related to technology and software development rather than editing articles about myself or my personal projects. UsamaSarwar (talk) 03:59, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Given that up until your block, your sole interest here was promoting yourself and your products, I think you'll have to make more effort than that to convince us that you've suddenly changed. I'm also not sure that allowing you to edit in areas directly related to those in which you have a conflict of interest is a good idea. Besides which, you engaged in some pretty unsavoury behaviour including article hijacks and personal attacks against other editors (in fact, I couldn't find a single constructive edit in your history, although perhaps I just didn't look carefully enough?), and we would need to know that wouldn't continue if you were unblocked.

I suggest you read WP:GAB before submitting a new appeal.

And next time, do not use AI, or your appeal may be declined for that alone. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:42, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UsamaSarwar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I am writing to appeal the block on my account. I want to sincerely apologize for the promotional editing and spam concerns associated wth this account. I previously entrusted my account access to my assistant to manage my online presence & he created this mess by doing promotional editing and trying to create promotional pages, which I now realize is indeed a severe violation of Wikipedia guidelines on shared accounts and conflict of interest. I have since reclaimed sole control of this account, changed the password, and terminated my assistant's access completely. I promise that I'll strictly follow all Wikipedia's policies, will not engage in any promotional editing, and will only contribute constructively in compliance with Wiki's community guidelines. I kindly request a second chance. Thanks! UsamaSarwar (talk) 14:36, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your account is now considered WP:COMPROMISED. No further unblock requests will be entertained. Yamla (talk) 16:08, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.