Undercoveranonymous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danish Minhas (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danish Minhas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 15:26, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

@Fade258 Can I cite my sources then reupload? Undercoveranonymous (talk) 15:32, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Undercoveranonymous. Thank You for your message. Please review WP:INLINE before submitting again. Thank You! Fade258 (talk) 15:36, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

@Fade258 I have added many verified citations in the article and I resubmitted it again. Can you approve the article this time? Hope you approve it. Undercoveranonymous (talk) 17:20, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

@Fade258 Hi, I resubmitted the article. Can you re review the article? Can you approve the article? It just needs some improvements and such. I already added all citations. Undercoveranonymous (talk) 18:49, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

@Fade258 Can you rereview the article Draft: Danish Minhas again? I made citations and such. Rereview the draft. Undercoveranonymous (talk) 20:27, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Undercoveranonymous! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fade258 (talk) 15:26, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Review Draft: Danish Minhas

Fade258, can you check my article draft Draft: Danish Minhas again? I made citations and changes. Check and review again it is up for rereview. Undercoveranonymous (talk) 20:26, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

@Fade258 Undercoveranonymous (talk) 20:26, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Undercoveranonymous, Sorry for late reply due to IRL engagement. I noticed that you have moved the draft in main article space. So, I don't think it should be reviewed but for the notability concern it should be reviewed by NPP other than me. Thank You! Fade258 (talk) 16:12, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danish Minhas (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

An event that did not have enduring historical significance and did not have a significant lasting effect.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danish Minhas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 21:49, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Danish Minhas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danish Minhas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danish Minhas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Zzz plant (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

@Zzz plant Don't delete the article. Leave the article the way it is and let it continue existing. No deleting the article. Undercoveranonymous (talk) 13:29, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

@Zzz plant Just don't delete the article. Undercoveranonymous (talk) 13:31, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

@Zzz plant The subject meets notability requirements because of the sources in the article. Look at the sources. Don't delete the article. Undercoveranonymous (talk) 13:42, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

@Zzz plant The article is thoroughly referenced with multiple independent, reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the case. All major claims are supported with inline citations, and the article maintains a neutral tone. It meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for biographies of individuals involved in criminal cases. Undercoveranonymous (talk) 13:47, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Danish Minhas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danish Minhas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danish Minhas (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Zzz plant (talk) 01:01, 18 February 2026 (UTC)