Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:1:AEA0:B593:C0B:56C0:3C06 (talk) 02:22, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:12, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

April 2017

edit
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Hildi Santo-Tomas shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editingespecially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringeven if you don't violate the three-revert ruleshould your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 10:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Truebeautyalways (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #18203 was submitted on May 05, 2017 04:24:09. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 04:24, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

The person that needs to blocked from Hildi santo Tomas' page needs to be User:Shakespeare21 previously known as User:Happy225 who is actually the same person from Wikipedia article James Cook (American Banker) . James Cook is the editor Shakespeare21 and Happy225. Truebeautyalways (talk) 03:45, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yet you allow him to continuously edit and vandalize her page and be obsessed with changing her birth year. Do your research and see that he is vandalizing her site. Every time someone corrects or removes her birthdate, he reverts back an incorrect year or adds it back. Pathetic! Truebeautyalways (talk) 03:48, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notice that Happy225, who is now Shakespear21 did the same thing starting in April 2009 to Patricia Cloherty. James Cook (American Banker) known as editor/User:Shakespeare21 and editor/User;Happy225 has a pattern of edit wars and vandalism on Wikipedia. Notice the incidents when you search for his contributions listed for Shakespeare21 (James Cook) dated back to September 2013. Same issue when he was constantly changing Patricia Cloherty's birthdate. Shakespeare21 (James Cook - American Banker) needs to be blocked from Hildi Santo Tomas' Wikipedia Article. Then just sit and wait for his next victim, or for him to create a new editor/User name. He is obviously obsessed and stalking Ms Santo Tomas in the manner he did Patricia Cloherty. Defamatory and baneful editing should not be allowed. HE needs to be blocked instead of being allowed to continuously fabricate lies such as he has done on Ms. Santo Tomas' article. Truebeautyalways (talk) 04:17, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Have you seen this that was written in Shakespeare21's talk page?

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Hildi Santo-Tomas. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KH-1 (talk) 01:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC) Truebeautyalways (talk) 04:32, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above is an excerpt from user:Shakespeare21 talk page on March 30, 2017. Why are you allowing him to continue without being blocked? STOP James Cook (American Banker), Shakespeare21, Happy225 - (all the same person) from defamatory vandalism and edit wars with only unsourced information. Please! Truebeautyalways (talk) 04:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC) Reply

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Truebeautyalways (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #18209 was submitted on May 06, 2017 05:43:54. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 05:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

The edit to Hildi Santo Tomas Wiki article on Nov. 14, 2016 from James Cook (American Banker)'s IP address 2A01:CB04:66:9400:A4BC:DBB:2D8B:F0AC tracing back to his address at 55, rue Varenne, Paris France - was the beginning of this STALKER's edit war.

It's about time someone does the research and puts and end to his intentional vandalism. Truebeautyalways (talk) 06:50, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

{{adminhelp}} Truebeautyalways (talk) 03:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

{{adminhelp}} Truebeautyalways (talk) 03:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC) Reply

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Truebeautyalways (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #18271 was submitted on May 13, 2017 00:01:20. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 00:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply