Thiagovscoelho

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 23:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your work

		The Original Barnstar
		For making the Formal Language series template. A great idea! Epachamo (talk) 12:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Thiagovscoelho. Thank you for your work on Concept horse paradox. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this helpful article in philosophy; it is appropriately referenced and linked from elsewhere. I wonder whether a shorter title, Concept horse might be even better, as not all of the sources frame this as a 'paradox', and simpler (unambiguous) titles are generally preferred.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 13:45, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

CfD

It seems that you have recently created and started adding the category Category:Triangles named after people to various articles. You should be aware of these recent discussions 1 2 that ended in a consensus to delete a number of very similar categories; I think it is likely that the rationale there applies to this new category, as well. --JBL (talk) 20:48, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Oh, maybe, I'm not sure. Either way I think that's no reason for removing the category from just one article. If you want to delete the whole thing I won't dispute it. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 20:51, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

One difference with this category is that many of the triangles are from outside mathematics. But again, I'm not sure how much that matters. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 20:53, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

I am not a regular editor of categories (that way lies madness), so I am not going to debate the similarities or differences, I just thought you should know.

Separately, about the revert at Pythagorean triple, apologies for not leaving an edit summary (I mis-clicked and didn't have the chance). In my opinion although Pythagorean triples are related to triangles, they are not themselves triangles, and the triangles involved ("right triangles") are not named after a person. YMMV -- I realize that Pythagorean triangle is a redirect to Pythagorean triple, and I don't know enough about standard category use here to know whether the category should go on the redirect or its target. --JBL (talk) 22:51, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Hayekian triangle

Hi @Thiagovscoelho: I reviewed this article. That last ref 10, seems a bit weird. I think you need find something better. Good article apart from that. scope_creep^Talk 21:30, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

If there's a problem with Granot's paper, you could remove the sentence that references it, but I don't see any problem with it, I would have thought it is RS. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 23:44, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Kiyotaki–Wright model of money moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kiyotaki–Wright model of money. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it consists of machine-generated text and need sources other than from the originators of the theory to show notability, WP:INDEPENDENT. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Farmland Protection Policy Act

		The Original Barnstar
		For your work on Farmland Protection Policy Act. Good work! Bearian (talk) 06:14, 22 May 2026 (UTC)