TBA

Thebiggestbear, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit


Teahouse logo

Hi Thebiggestbear! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 18 October 2020 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Heremaia (October 20)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Doesn't pass WP:NPOL
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Snowycats (talk) 04:20, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Heremaia (April 9)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Jacob Heremaia does not pass our notability guidelines for politicians. He would also need significant coverage in at least three independent reliable sources to be notable under the general notability guidelines.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noah 💬 17:20, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Jacob Heremaia

edit

Information icon Hello, Thebiggestbear. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jacob Heremaia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Jacob Heremaia

edit

Hello, Thebiggestbear. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jacob Heremaia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply