Talk Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Babatunde Fagbohunlu (September 8)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Princess of Ara was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is sourced mostly to self-submitted profiles and trivial mentions. A subject is considered notable if they have had significant coverage in multiple reliable which are independent of the subject. Can you find any for this subject?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Princess of Ara 18:33, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Textor Alector! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Princess of Ara 18:33, 8 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Babatunde Fagbohunlu (February 12)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I saw that the submitter suggested that the subject ought to be notable because we've got a number of red links for him. It's true that we want to fill red links, but no subject is ever notable because of them. What determines notability coverage in independent sources, of which this draft does not demonstrate enough.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Modussiccandi (talk) 21:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Babatunde Fagbohunlu

edit

Information icon Hello, Textor Alector. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Babatunde Fagbohunlu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Babatunde Fagbohunlu

edit

Hello, Textor Alector. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Babatunde Fagbohunlu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply