StickJockey786

Before posting, please follow the NOTES at top of page.

April 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ckfasdf (talk) 00:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

May I kindly ask what has been reverted and why. Syed Ayan Ather (talk) 19:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Firstly, you put Y-9 image into Shaanxi Y-8 article on this edit, secondly you put number of Su-30M of Algerian Air Force as 70 on this edit, while the cited source (Military Balance 2024) state number of Su-30 is 59. Ckfasdf (talk) 01:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Then Pakistan Air Force operates Y-9 then why are they in the Operators section of Y-8? Syed Ayan Ather (talk) 00:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

I mean the PAF used to operate it they have recently retired it. Syed Ayan Ather (talk) 00:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Upon further investigation, it appears that there was a mistake in the description of the image on Commons, as it should be Y-8 instead of Y-9. However, I remain opposed to replacing the image with that of the Shaanxi Y-8. Even though it has an AWACS variant, the Y-8 is primarily a transport aircraft, so the image displayed should represent the Y-8 in its capacity as a transport aircraft. Ckfasdf (talk) 02:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Westland Sea King. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 20:31, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2025

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of active Pakistan Navy ships, you may be blocked from editing. Please include an edit summary when you remove content. Minehollow (talk) 22:08, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

I can give you an adequate explaination, I removed excess information outside the table and which was not important in this specific article, I'll make sure to leave an edit summary next time, my apologies, but in no way was my edit deconstructive. Please feel free to share your point of view. Syed Ayan Ather (talk) 13:34, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of airlines of Pakistan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:30, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

The Reliable sources references are given on the SereneAir article of it's temporary suspension, My edit was correct, it's just that I don't know how to add a reference to a foreign website, If you know how to, please revert to my edit and add the referenced sources from Serene Air article to List of airlines of Pakistan, because as of now Serene Air is not operating any flight (domestic or International) due to fleet being inoperable. Thank you Syed Ayan Ather (talk) 21:16, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

There’s a guide at WP:Referencing for beginners. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 14:07, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you Syed Ayan Ather (talk) 04:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

February 2026

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of Airbus A320 family operators, you may be blocked from editing. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 10:54, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Its not unsourced, how is it unsourced, I have tagged the airlines article, it says it operates them. Syed Ayan Ather (talk) 12:09, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

You added a wikilink to another article - that's not a source. If there are sources in that article that verify what you're adding, then they have to be copied over to where you are adding that content. Readers aren't expected to go hunting for sources - it's up to editors to provide them. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:20, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

So if I add reliable sources to articles reference section, can I make the edit? Syed Ayan Ather (talk) 12:35, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Absolutely - the best way to do this is using inline citations tagged against the information that the source verifies. See WP:Referencing for beginners if you're stuck :) Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:39, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you Syed Ayan Ather (talk) 12:42, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I made my AirSial edit on List of Airbus A320 family operators but this time with citations, I hope it checks out, TY. Syed Ayan Ather (talk) 21:15, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

My only note is that Planespotters isn’t reliable per WP:PLANESPOTTERS, since it’s basically a fan wiki Danners430 _{tweaks made} 10:31, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Oh, I will try to find a better source that shows the exact fleet size of Airsial, I have provided another trusted source that backs that Airsial operates A320 , but doesn't specify how many. Syed Ayan Ather (talk) 10:38, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

I expect a reply, TY Syed Ayan Ather (talk) 12:14, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

My friend, you replied to me over an hour after I originally left this message. Do you really expect that I must reply in the space of 5 minutes? No. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:20, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Haha no I am not expecting you to reply quickly, just that you do not reply back at all, some users on wiki do that, so about thatSyed Ayan Ather (talk) 12:23, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Hello, I'm JavaHurricane. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, IRIS Shahid Soleimani, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fox News is not a reliable source for political matters; see this guideline for details. JavaHurricane 20:25, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, ok got it, I'll try finding a better source, thank you. :) Syed Ayan Ather (talk) 14:37, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Always cite reliable sources

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of equipment of the Bangladesh Army, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:16, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Block review

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

StickJockey786 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Your reason here StickJockey786 (talk) 23:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)I was blocked on 20 October 2024 from using wikipedia commons, and my block expiry is on 20 October 2026,I kindly ask that my block be reviewed, because I may have been using a proxy, at the time I was new and simply didn't know that wikipedia blocks if it being used on proxy. It was completely unintentional, and I have no intention of causing any kind of vandalism. I can still edit articles on wikipedia but I can't access wikipedia commons.Thank you

Decline reason:

We have no authority at Wikipedia Commons; you'll need to make that request there. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:18, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

StickJockey786 (talk) 23:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) caste-related topics in South Asia.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Worldbruce (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

One aircraft, two aircraft etc

Hello. The correct plural of aircraft is also aircraft. Hope this helps, best wishes, DBaK (talk) 21:14, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

got it, TY:) StickJockey786 (talk) 22:58, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Excellent, and you are very welcome. Cheers DBaK (talk) 15:13, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Air Indus

I just reverted your edit because planespotters.net is not a reliable source - see WP:PLANESPOTTERS. Obviously you should add the data back if you can find a different source. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 20:59, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

yes, your reason is completely understandable, but their is photographical evidence provided on the the planespotters.net source, it shows a Air Indus B737 parked somewhere at Phoenix Goodyear Airport partially scrapped and derelict, i would appreciate if you could check it out and reconsider, because i have another source from the website History of PIA but it only mentions the B737 retired but no mentioned of them being scrapped, possibly because it wasn't updated. TY:) StickJockey786 (talk) 21:41, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

It's user-generated content. Wikipedia just doesn't like photos as references 10mmsocket (talk) 21:57, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on History of submarines

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page History of submarines, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:41, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Research reactor

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Research reactor, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic title error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:18, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of airlines of Pakistan, you may be blocked from editing. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 19:55, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dassault Mirage 5. You've accumulated a litany of warnings for sourcing, and have been explicitly warned not to use Wikipeda as a source , to which you replied indicating understanding , and now you have again added Wikipedia as sources . Enough, you have had more than ample opportunity to learn, failure to adhere to WP:V and WP:RS one more time is extremely likely to end in an indefinite block. Stop. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 00:08, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Ok please relax, the discussion of using Wikipedia as source was a long time ago, and i haven't used Wiki as source since, or at least not until now, and I apologize for not remembering. I literally back all my edits with source, except some grammatical corrections, and very minor edits, I am not looked forward for Vandalism in fact I am against it. Most warning on my page are of "poorly sourced" edits rather than "unsourced" ones. There are many sources that Wikipedia accepts, but it doesn't sit well with some editors and that's fine, we mutually discuss an outcome. I hope you understand. TY :) StickJockey786 (talk) 00:27, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

was a long time ago, it was 86 days ago, less than three months.

I literally back all my edits with source, except some grammatical corrections, and very minor edits, Edit: (neither grammar nor minor), warning: . Edit: (neither grammar nor minor), warning: . Edit: (neither grammar nor minor), warning: . Edit: (neither grammar nor minor), warning: (this one was removed, as is your right).

I am trying to be clear that this pattern of repeated sourcing failures is a serious issue that must stop. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 01:03, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Plug-in electric vehicles in Pakistan

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Plug-in electric vehicles in Pakistan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:13, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plug-in electric vehicles in Pakistan, a link pointing to the disambiguation page BYD was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Bombardier Challenger 600 series

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bombardier Challenger 600 series, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:45, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Reliable sources

Hi, please note that not all sources are classed as reliable on Wikipedia. As with Planespotters, Simple Flying is also regarded as unreliable per WP:SIMPLEFLYING. I'd recommend having a look at WP:RSP, which is the list of "perennial sources" - ie sources that get discussed time and again, and many of them coming to the conclusion that they snouldn't be included.

Also, please don't mark such major additions such as you did at IndiGo fleet as "minor" - minor additions are edits such as typos, grammar tweaks, fixing markup etc. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:10, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Sure i'll remove that source StickJockey786 (talk) 15:11, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Yesss thats just a weird habit, sorry, ill try not to do it again :)) StickJockey786 (talk) 15:13, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello @Danners430, i don't understand why you removed the whole B-787 column, and not just the Simple Flying source? StickJockey786 (talk) 15:17, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

As far as I could tell, none of the other sources verified the number of seats so it was easier to rv until we could find a better source Danners430 _{tweaks made} 15:19, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

So can i just write "N/A" on the Seat column?? StickJockey786 (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Princely Jets (June 6)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Helpful Raccoon, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Princely Jets to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:23, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello, StickJockey786! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Helpful Raccoon (talk) 02:23, 6 June 2026 (UTC)