Obey Giant

edit

On the Wikipedia entry for Obey Giant, somebody has submitted a photo that they claim is from the 60s which says "Lee Harvey Oswald was a Patsy" and looks a lot like the original 'Andre the Giant has a posse" sticker. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Andr%C3%A9_the_Giant_Has_a_Posse#Lee_Harvey_Oswald_was_a_Patsy

Know anything about this? --Theinfo 15:11, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Central Michigan Life

edit

In your most recent revert, you quoted policy, but AGAIN failed to follow it. As you quoted: "entry in any such list requires a reliable source" ... yet you repeatedly re-insert the list without any sources to support them. Please see my reply on the article talk page where I tried to spell it out more clearly. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 04:40, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Into the Air: A Kiteboarding Experience moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Into the Air: A Kiteboarding Experience, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering(t) 20:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Into the Air: A Kiteboarding Experience (January 9)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Non-notable awards. Non-notable film. Needs more sources to show otherwise.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 03:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Surelyserious! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 03:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
  • You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Surelyserious (talk) 14:05, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm just wondering what else I have to do to get this stub listed. Into The Air has been around for A LONG TIME. And it is seminal in terms of kiteboarding. At the time it was released, kiteboarding was a relatively new sport. Literally ALL the figures featured in the film went on to contribute to the sport as well as continue to kiteboard today. All are googleable as professional kiteboarders. What brought the absence of this film and the contributors–even the composers of the soundtrack are well known, highly recognized music composers–to my attention was simply picking up kiteboarding and seeing it referenced on the kiteboard forums from way back when all the way to today. To call Into The Air "non-notable" is to be unfamiliar with the sport and the film. If it were indeed non-notable it would not be an ongoing selection on Netflix and Amazon both, and it would not be remembered as it is today by kiteboarders, and it would not be chock full of young versions of some of the most well-known practitioners of the sport today. Yet, it is.

Your draft article, Draft:Into the Air: A Kiteboarding Experience

edit

Hello, Surelyserious. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Into the Air: A Kiteboarding Experience".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 07:37, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply