Stingkygow
| This is Stingkygow's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Connester (November 15)
edit
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Connester and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, Stingkygow!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 09:14, 15 November 2025 (UTC) |
- Plz review my article. I have fixed all the issues. Thank you Stingkygow (talk) 01:04, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Cut and paste move
edit
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of Draft:Connester by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Connester. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 14:34, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Connester (November 19)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Connester and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- It seems like the user has gone ahead and created the article without AfC. asoundd 14:38, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connester until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Fram (talk) 16:50, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- The article meets the wikipedias requirements for companies under WP:GNG, WP:PRGIND and WP:CORP. Connester has received multiple reliable sources with significant coverages. They are full news articles discussing the company's origin, recognition platform model and operations.
- Plz check
- Independent reliable sources with significant coverage:
- 1.https://www.outlookindia.com/hub4business/how-subeesh-bose-is-building-connester-into-indias-most-ambitious-all-in-one-business-networking-platform
- 2.https://newsable.asianetnews.com/pr-spot/something-big-is-coming-from-kerala-dpiit-recognized-startup-connester-set-articleshow-o3c39gv
- 3.https://www.hindustanmetro.com/connester-gains-official-recognition-from-kerala-startup-mission/
- 4.https://www.apnnews.com/connester-the-silent-startup-from-kerala-poised-to-become-indias-next-digital-giant/
- 5.https://www.mynation.com/business/connester-marketplace-redefines-digital-product-and-service-discovery-articleshow-eh8z2hy
- 6.https://theblunttimes.in/connester-freelance-feature-empowers-local-workforce-across-india/54004/
- 7.https://edtimes.in/the-inspiring-story-of-connester-how-a-unique-vision-from-angamoozhy-is-shaping-a-global-digital-ecosystem/ Stingkygow (talk) 17:07, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, you may prefer noting your thoughts on the discussion page itself. asoundd 11:16, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Welcome!
edit
Hello, Stingkygow, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Rosiestep (talk) 12:01, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Stingkygow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
No idea, why i got block Stingkygow (talk) 03:29, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were blocked for the reason given in the block notice above.
"No idea, why i got block" is not a valid appeal. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Re: to question in unblock request
editYou were blocked because a CheckUser discovered that there are multiple accounts, including yours, that show similar behaviours and are associated with the same IP address, which indicates that they are being operated by the same person. This is called sockpuppetry and when done for disruptive reasons, such as in an attempt to flip consensus in a discussion (as appears to have been the case) is prohibited on Wikipedia. I am not an administrator and cannot act on your unblock request, but you can view the relevant investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/SUBEESH_BOSE. RandFreeman 05:47, 26 November 2025 (UTC)