StickyMan1982

Welcome!

Hi StickyMan1982! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! rymich13 (talk) 19:33, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hydroneer moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hydroneer. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and WP:TOOSOON for a game that does not have any cited reviews from reliable sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 22:03, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Oh alright that makes sense, yeah I just saw the article and made some improvement to it as a new user to Wikipedia, but I didn't create the article anyways so that's fine to me, thanks for the notice! StickyMan1982 (talk) 22:28, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jumanji: Wild Adventures (March 12)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Vrxces, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Gaming Boulevard and Xbox Hub are the only sources of WP:SIGCOV, but neither are really WP:RS that we'd consider a good source to meet the general notability guideline. Needs something substantial from a good source to cross the line.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Jumanji: Wild Adventures to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 06:54, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, StickyMan1982! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 06:54, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dodgeball Academia has been accepted

Dodgeball Academia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ A412 ^talk! 17:20, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Necromancer's Tale has been accepted

The Necromancer's Tale, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

nil ^nz 00:50, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

The Necromancer's Tale moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Necromancer's Tale. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and I want to give a new editor a chance to understand Wikipedia’s WP:NOLLM policy, and to rewrite the article themself in Draftspace before resubmitting.

Hi @StickyMan1982 and welcome to Wikipedia! I’m sorry to draftify your newly created page, but I’m afraid it appears to be AI-generated and the Wikipedia does not allow AI-written articles. I wanted to explain the problems in the article because I hope you’ll stay here at Wikipedia and write and edit yourself instead of using AI. We need editors who are interested in video games. If you are using AI because English is your second language please understand that we prefer typos and grammatical errors to AI because they are FAR easier to correct.

The language in the article is very AI-ish, and scored 59% AI-generated on GPTZero, which is not, of course, always correct. But after carefully checking your text and the sources, I think it would have been difficult for you to write this article without using AI. There is a lot of LLM paraphrasing of sources with slight errors and added hallucinations that sound plausible.

EXAMPLE 1: The description of the trust system as having severe social consequences" is a typical LLM type of paraphrasing where concrete examples are generalized. When I asked ChatGPT to compare the paragraph starting with “Necromancy is a central part of the game's structure” to the source you gave for it, ChatGPT not only noted that the bits about "hex-based battlefields" and "mental states" are not in the source, it also described the closest match in the source to the "mental states" as being the trust system, and it used exactly the vague paraphrasing "social consequences" that I noted above as sounding LLM-ish.

The closest match in the source is this section:

“The decisions we make also affect how much trust other characters place in us… we may start encountering problems… in extreme cases we may fall victim to lynching or be brought to court and sentenced to death.” This describes:

• A reputation / trust system
• Social consequences of your actions

EXAMPLE 2:

• Source (Vice) “Beautifully written dialogue, paired with stylistic portraits, evokes the spirit of Disco Elysium.” (..) “If you’ve been searching for a dark, gritty, and sometimes disgusting RPG to engross yourself in, you can’t go wrong with this one.”[1]
• Article: “Vice praised its dialogue, visual style, and writing, calling it a dark and engrossing role-playing game and giving it a verdict of "Highly Recommended.”[4]”

Here we see in the generated text in the article first the LLM template of a list with three items, and you also see that the summarised list is LESS SPECIFIC than the source text. The second bit is just wrong - Vice does NOT call it a “dark and engrossing role-playing game”, this is a revising that slightly changes the meaning of the original source - and it’s the kind of paraphrasing that humans don’t usually do. It’s remixing words, not summarising a source for its meaning.

You're a new editor so may not be aware of Wikipedia's prohibition of using LLMs to write articles, so I just wanted to let you know about this. In this case it looks as though the AI-generated material isn't VERY wrong but it is wrong - using LLMs is very risky for an encyclopedia like Wikipedia that aims to be authoritative and that we know will also be used to train new LLMs.

I sent this back to draft to give you a chance to rewrite it. I hope you do so - and PLEASE WRITE IT YOURSELF! . I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Lijil (talk) 08:52, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Oh okay I see I didn't know that! So let's say if an article was made with the help of AI, but contained 100% accurate information, would that still be deleted? StickyMan1982 (talk) 03:51, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Official Steam cover for video game "Muck".jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Official Steam cover for video game "Muck".jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:30, 23 June 2026 (UTC)