SimplifyUX

Welcome!

Hello, SimplifyUX!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:35, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Professor Guillermo Andres Narsilio (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Professor Guillermo Andres Narsilio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jlwoodwa (talk) 05:51, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Dear reviewer. Thanks for your insights.

I have indeed used LLM to help me produce a refined version of my initial hand crafted document. I believe they where of better quality than my original pieces.

I understand the concerns and I will revise them.

However, the main difficulty I had, was the wikipedia markup language. I needed the LLM to produce the markup.

It this what you are referring too? SimplifyUX (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

One issue is that many claims, like Professor Narsilio's research has influenced urban planning and energy policies, are cited to a "rate my professor"-type website with a clearly AI-generated "professional summary". jlwoodwa (talk) 16:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, SimplifyUX! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! jlwoodwa (talk) 05:51, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Carlos Horacio Cáceres (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Carlos Horacio Cáceres and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jlwoodwa (talk) 05:53, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Same as per my previous comment:

Dear reviewer. Thanks for your insights.

I have indeed used LLM to help me produce a refined version of my initial hand crafted document. I believe they where of better quality than my original pieces.

I understand the concerns and I will revise them.

However, the main difficulty I had, was the wikipedia markup language. I needed the LLM to produce the markup.

It this what you are referring too? SimplifyUX (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Sentences like Such citation metrics are a primary criterion for academic notability (WP:PROF #C1). are chatbot commentary that does not belong in an encyclopedia article. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Professor Guillermo Andres Narsilio

Hello, SimplifyUX. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Professor Guillermo Andres Narsilio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dr. Carlos Horacio Cáceres

Hello, SimplifyUX. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dr. Carlos Horacio Cáceres, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Guillermo A. Narsilio has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Guillermo A. Narsilio. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:50, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

Titles in titles

Hi, a small thing (in the overall scheme of things), but could you please not add 'Professor', 'Dr', etc. in draft titles, per WP:TITLESINTITLES, since they do not form part of the subject's name. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:53, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the revision. I have removed the titles as per requested.

Regards SimplifyUX (talk) 13:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC)