Seloumadin

Welcome!

Hi Seloumadin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Hikingboii (talk) 02:20, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Hikingboii

Im really happy tp be here too, and thanks you. Seloumadin (talk) 20:12, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Villaverde Bajo-Cruce (Madrid Metro), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 21:09, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Eric Muñoz, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 21:57, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, but i was just about to add a source the moment i clicked to publish my edit, you remove the text. i have a soruce for that text. Seloumadin (talk) 22:01, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Now what i do please ? add the text back or give up ? and did i get a warning for that ? Seloumadin (talk) 22:02, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm MrOllie. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that in one of your recent contributions you cited a link to a source that may not be reliable. Sources considered unreliable should generally not be used to support statements. Information from an unreliable source can be challenged by other editors and removed. Reliable sources are generally those with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. Self-published material, user-generated content, and certain other outlets such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites or publications with a poor reputation for fact-checking may not meet these standards. If you are unsure about which sources are appropriate, there is a list of sources that are considered generally reliable. Additionally, some WikiProjects have their own lists of sources that are considered reliable for that particular subtopic. If you are still unsure about a source's reliability, you can ask at the reliable sources noticeboard. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 13:42, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your notice, and thanks for letting me know, i try my very best each time when i add a source to search about it first if it is reliable or not, but even though sometimes i still can make some mistakes, i will try to be more careful about it, and than you again for letting me know. Seloumadin (talk) 19:52, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Hall & Oates, you may be blocked from editing. At Hall & Oates, you supplied synthesizer citations which did not mention Hall & Oates. That is a violation of WP:SYNTH, ironically enough. Binksternet (talk) 23:06, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

OMG, so sorry my bad really, in my research i was focusing about Synclavier in general, and missed the Hall & Oates mention in that part; Sorry i will be more accurate and focused next time. Seloumadin (talk) 23:18, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This is for your contributions related to the Gaza war. Pachu Kannan (talk) 18:56, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello,

Thank you so much for the barnstar. Seloumadin (talk) 19:01, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Niederkrüchten, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schwalm was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minesapride (May 24)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Umais Bin Sajjad, left the following feedback:

Declining for now. The draft does not yet clearly establish notability under WP:GNG for this investigational/discontinued drug, as it relies mainly on primary clinical/preclinical studies and database entries rather than independent secondary coverage. Medical and pharmacology claims should be supported by high quality secondary sources per WP:MEDRS, with no primary source synthesis per WP:NOR. Please add reviews, guidelines, textbooks, or other independent significant coverage, and resolve the contradiction between “under clinical investigation” and “development discontinued” per WP:V and WP:NPOV.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Minesapride to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Umais🗣 13:39, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Seloumadin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Umais🗣 13:39, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minesapride (May 30)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, WeirdNAnnoyed, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Agreed with previous reviewer that this drug candidate is non-notable. Almost all sources are primary and/or trivial mentions; the systematic review (Tack et al., Refs. 9 and 13) does not mention the compound at all, under either name. Furthermore, the citation formatting needs work. Many sources are repeated; please see WP:LDR so that each time a source is cited it doesn't appear as a new reference. Also, Refs. 2 and 3 (again, the same article) are cited incorrectly; "Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics" is the title of the journal, not the article (which makes me wonder if the article was read before being cited).

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Minesapride to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Seloumadin. Thank you for your work on Andrea Giunti. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add a source for the following claim: "In 2019, he was included in Forbes Italy's 100 Under 30." Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:15, 9 June 2026 (UTC)